From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 803 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2012 16:18:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 746 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Mar 2012 16:18:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 16:17:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00AB2F7800D for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 17:17:47 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gj3E7DFRmjDN; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 17:17:45 +0100 (BST) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001545] ustl: update to uSTL 1.6 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: sergei.gavrikov@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: low X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 16:18:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20120325161745.C231D2F78005@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00115.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001545 --- Comment #2 from Sergei Gavrikov 2012-03-25 17:17:43 BST --- (In reply in comment #1) > Sergei, great to see this patch. Thank you. > > The patch looks clean. You have replaced the NextPow2 implementation > with the latest from upstream which is good. Our efforts to minimise > the differences between eCos uSTL sources and upstream are working > well for us. > > If the tests are building and running OK with GCC 4.3.2 tools (default > template + ustl + fileio), then I see no reason why you should not > check this in. It is always good to check uSTL with a target > architecture other than x86 since Mike Sharov works mainly with x86. > We know that a few of the tests are interactive and will therefore not > run. Yep. I used default+fileio+ustl without any tweaks and run the tests under GDB. A summary - No new warnings with GCC 4.3.2 & GCC 4.6.3 - All bvt tests were run on ARMv4 (LE) target (GCC 4.3.2 & 4.6.3 builds) without fails - All bvt tests (but bvt23) also were run on eCos Linux synthetic target NOTE: it was not possible to build `bvt23' for synthetic target, but that is old "lrint*" issue: http://sourceware.org/ml/ecos-patches/2010-06/msg00027.html -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.