From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25813 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2012 13:32:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 25803 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Apr 2012 13:32:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 13:32:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC1F2F78014 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:32:00 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s9PuwirNRI4Y; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:31:58 +0100 (BST) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001550] STM32 F2 and STM3220G-EVAL / STM3240G-EVAL contribution from eCosCentric X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: ilijak@siva.com.mk X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: low X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jifl@ecoscentric.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 13:32:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20120403133158.7B9D22F78003@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001550 --- Comment #16 from Ilija Kocho 2012-04-03 14:31:55 BST --- Hi Yerzi (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > > But yes, since an ethernet driver is not included in this contribution, > > (...) > > @Jonathan Larmour > > Before I'm starting work I think that status of eCosCentric ethernet driver > > have to be clarify. [snip] > > 2. Is it any plan to push ethernet driver in near future? > > There isn't. You wouldn't be able to use it in any case, and to understand it > properly, you would need information on our single-copy driver interface which > is something which is being kept in-house for the foreseeable future. If you're > having specific problems with, say, driver initialisation, I could cut'n'paste > some snippets, but it wouldn't be the whole driver. [snip] > > > Summarizing: > > I open to modify driver and if anyone is still interesting in my implementation > > of ethernet driver for STM32 I can do that. > > I'm sure people are. Don't underestimate the many people who will use stuff if > it's there and if it isn't just walk away :). Bug #1001219 is still actual, you can just continue there. > > > IMO The fastest and simplest way to push driver is using contributing eval > > board STM322/40G but I don't have any possibility to achieve it. > To begin with, you can continue with your Propox board, anyway the Ethernet driver should fit all variants. Your CL variant port may be redundant but you could synchronize Propox platform port to current CVS. For STMF4 you could consider Discovery board. For the details we can continue in Bug #1001219 CU Ilija -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.