From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16747 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2012 08:36:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 16632 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Apr 2012 08:36:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:35:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6D92F78015 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:35:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Md5AKQrhNnAF; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:35:44 +0100 (BST) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001550] STM32 F2 and STM3220G-EVAL / STM3240G-EVAL contribution from eCosCentric X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: ilijak@siva.com.mk X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: low X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jifl@ecoscentric.com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:36:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20120405083544.004AC2F78006@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00030.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001550 --- Comment #20 from Ilija Kocho 2012-04-05 09:35:37 BST --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #9) [snip] > > * The "set_value" keyword in ecos.db was introduced as a quick hack for use > > within the Red Hat test farm and was never intended to be used elsewhere. > > set_value will provide a user_value for the specified CDL item which can > > therefore be inadvertently changed using the "restore defaults" action in > > configtool. I would really like to consider the use of "set_value" to be > > deprecated. It should always be possible to use a separate tiny CDL-only > > package to achieve the same effect. Are you OK with this? > > Not really, no. Firstly, other targets use it. Secondly, the design intention > for CDL is that targets should be defined by platform packages, albeit with > "requires" rather than "set_value". As such this is much closer to the way > things are intended to be. Yes it originated as a solution to a specific > problem, but then so is ecos.db, which shouldn't exist at all. What we can do > at the moment is make the transition to a future improved world easier, so that > makes this approach better. Why isn't this available in CDL? I always wanted some kind of soft "requires", that will set/change default value but not hinder user override. My proposed name was supposed to be "recommends" but "set_value" is perhaps better. Ilija -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.