From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1324 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2012 11:04:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 1316 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Aug 2012 11:04:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 11:04:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5896C2F7800C for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:03:59 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b7InlyMz21OY; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:03:58 +0100 (BST) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001490] C99 snprintf() does not include terminated null in truncated strings X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: low X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 11:04:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20120809110358.03C482F78009@mail.ecoscentric.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001490 --- Comment #10 from Bernd Edlinger 2012-08-09 12:03:55 BST --- (In reply to comment #9) > Feel free. It's okay for me. > Regarding Bug #1001628, do you resist on new check for `sprintf2.c?' Could you > reject it from the final patch? Why I ask, IMHO, your patches are small enough > to commit them without a copyright assignment, otherwise the copyright > assignment is required for any significant changes to the core eCos packages: > http://ecos.sourceware.org/assign.html > Thank you, > Sergei Ok. Done. Of course I did not touch the snprintf2.c test file, as it is obvious, that your patch would break otherwise.. Thanks Bernd. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.