Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

[H Hartley Sweeten]

Hello all,

Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support?
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739

Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would it
be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly clean
except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the patch.

Regards,
Hartley


ecos/packages/devs/eth/arm/edb93xx/current/cdl/edb93xx_eth_drivers.cdl (+121 lines)
	This file exists twice in the patch
ecos/packages/devs/eth/arm/edb93xx/current/src/edb93xx_eth.h (+347 lines)
	This file exists twice in the patch
ecos/packages/devs/eth/arm/edb93xx/current/src/if_edb93xx.c (+1027 lines)
	This file exists twice in the patch
ecos/packages/devs/eth/arm/edb93xx/current/cdl/edb93xx_eth_drivers.cdl (+121 lines)
	This file exists twice in the patch
ecos/packages/devs/eth/arm/edb93xx/current/src/edb93xx_eth.h (+347 lines)
	This file exists twice in the patch
ecos/packages/devs/eth/arm/edb93xx/current/src/if_edb93xx.c (+1027 lines)
	This file exists twice in the patch

ecos/packages/devs/flash/arm/edb93xx/current/cdl/flash_edb93xx.cdl (+115 lines)
	This file exists twice in the patch
ecos/packages/devs/flash/arm/edb93xx/current/include/edb93xx_strataflash.inl (+16 lines)
	This file exists twice in the patch
ecos/packages/devs/flash/arm/edb93xx/current/src/edb93xx_flash.c (+73 lines)
	This file exists twice in the patch
ecos/packages/devs/flash/arm/edb93xx/current/cdl/flash_edb93xx.cdl (+116 lines)
	This file exists twice in the patch
ecos/packages/devs/flash/arm/edb93xx/current/cdl/flash_edb93xx.cdl.orig (+115 lines)
	Garbage file due to how Cirrus handled the build
ecos/packages/devs/flash/arm/edb93xx/current/include/edb93xx_strataflash.inl (+61 lines)
	This file exists twice in the patch
ecos/packages/devs/flash/arm/edb93xx/current/src/edb93xx_flash.c (+73 lines)
	This file exists twice in the patch
ecos/packages/devs/flash/intel/strata/current/src/flash_erase_block.c (+24 lines)
ecos/packages/devs/flash/intel/strata/current/src/flash_unlock_block.c (+26 lines)
ecos/packages/devs/flash/intel/strata/current/src/strata.c (+22 lines)
ecos/packages/devs/flash/intel/strata/current/src/strata.h (-1/+2 lines)
	All of this is to support the P30 StrataFlash.  I don't think
	it's actually "right".	

ecos/packages/ecos.db (-2/+39 lines)
	All the EDB93XX stuff should probably be grouped together until
	the port is cleaned up.

ecos/packages/hal/arm/arch/current/src/redboot_linux_exec.c (-1/+4 lines)
	This is just informational junk.  It should probably be purged.

ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/cdl/hal_arm_arm9_edb93xx.cdl (+543 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/ChangeLog (+25 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/edb93xx.h (+189 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/hal_diag.h (+85 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/hal_platform_inits.h (+215 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/hal_platform_setup.h (+916 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9301_ram.h (+18 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9301_ram.ldi (+27 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9301_ram.mlt (+13 lines)ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9301_romram.h (+17 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9301_romram.ldi (+26 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9301_romram.mlt (+14 lines)ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9302a_ram.h (+18 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9302a_ram.ldi (+27 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9302a_ram.mlt (+13 lines)ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9302a_romram.h (+17 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9302a_romram.ldi (+26 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9302a_romram.mlt (+14 lines)ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9302_ram.h (+18 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9302_ram.ldi (+27 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9302_ram.mlt (+13 lines)ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9302_romram.h (+17 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9302_romram.ldi (+26 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9302_romram.mlt (+14 lines)ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9307a_ram.h (+18 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9307a_ram.ldi (+27 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9307a_ram.mlt (+13 lines)ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9307a_romram.h (+17 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9307a_romram.ldi (+26 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9307a_romram.mlt (+14 lines)ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9307_ram.h (+18 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9307_ram.ldi (+27 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9307_ram.mlt (+13 lines)ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9307_romram.h (+17 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9307_romram.ldi (+26 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9307_romram.mlt (+14 lines)ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9312_ram.h (+18 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9312_ram.ldi (+27 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9312_ram.mlt (+13 lines)ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9312_romram.h (+17 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9312_romram.ldi (+26 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9312_romram.mlt (+14 lines)ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9315a_ram.h (+18 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9315a_ram.ldi (+27 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9315a_ram.mlt (+13 lines)ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9315a_romram.h (+17 lines)ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9315a_romram.ldi (+26 lines)ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9315a_romram.mlt (+14 lines)ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9315_ram.h (+18 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9315_ram.ldi (+27 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9315_ram.mlt (+13 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9315_romram.h (+17 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9315_romram.ldi (+26 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_arm9_edb9315_romram.mlt (+14 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/plf_io.h (+87 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/plf_stub.h (+75 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/include/regs_VIC.h (+411 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/misc/redboot_RAM.ecm (+93 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/misc/redboot_ROMRAM.ecm (+104 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/src/edb93xx_misc.c (+389 lines)
ecos/packages/hal/arm/arm9/edb93xx/current/src/hal_diag.c (+582 lines)

Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

[Gary Thomas]

H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support?
> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
> 
> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would it
> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly clean
> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the patch.
> 

AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------

Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

[Jonathan Larmour]

Gary Thomas wrote:
> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> 
>>Hello all,
>>
>>Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support?
>>http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>
>>Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would it
>>be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly clean
>>except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the patch.
>>
> 
> 
> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.

Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never made 
an assignment.

Jifl
-- 
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine

Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

[Gary Thomas]

Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> Gary Thomas wrote:
>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support?
>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>
>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would it
>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly clean
>>> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the patch.
>>>
>>
>>
>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
> 
> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never
> made an assignment.

They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't have
time to search right now).

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------

RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

[H Hartley Sweeten]

On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>> Gary Thomas wrote:
>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support?
>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>
>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would it
>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly clean
>>>> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the patch.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>> 
>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never
>> made an assignment.
>
> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
> timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't have
> time to search right now).

Does anyone know the status of this?

I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
original patch is still not in CVS.

Thanks for your time,
Hartley

Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

[Jonathan Larmour]

H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> 
>>Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>
>>>Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>>>H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hello all,
>>>>>
>>>>>Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support?
>>>>>http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>>
>>>>>Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would it
>>>>>be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>>>CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly clean
>>>>>except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the patch.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>>>
>>>Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never
>>>made an assignment.
>>
>>They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
>>timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't have
>>time to search right now).
> 
> 
> Does anyone know the status of this?
> 
> I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
> original patch is still not in CVS.

I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've submitted an 
assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or they 
never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask Cirrus.

Jifl
-- 
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine

RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

[H Hartley Sweeten]

On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> 
>>> Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support?
>>>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would it
>>>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly clean
>>>>>> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>>>>
>>>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they never
>>>> made an assignment.
>>>
>>> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
>>> timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't have
>>> time to search right now).
>> 
>> 
>> Does anyone know the status of this?
>>
>> I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
>> original patch is still not in CVS.
>
> I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've submitted an 
> assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or they 
> never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask Cirrus.

Hello Brian,

On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list:

> I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch for
> the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla.  Hopefully someone will start to
> forward port the code base.

Did the contracts ever get submitted?  Your patch is still in the ecos
bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official confirmation
from FSF.

Thanks,
Hartley

RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

[Austin, Brian]

Crap!  Sorry guys,

I'll mail that off.

-----Original Message-----
From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:11 PM
To: Austin, Brian
Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
eCos Maintainers
Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> 
>>> Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9
support?
>>>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would
it
>>>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly
clean
>>>>>> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the
patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>>>>
>>>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they
never
>>>> made an assignment.
>>>
>>> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
>>> timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't
have
>>> time to search right now).
>> 
>> 
>> Does anyone know the status of this?
>>
>> I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
>> original patch is still not in CVS.
>
> I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've
submitted an 
> assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or
they 
> never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask
Cirrus.

Hello Brian,

On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list:

> I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch
for
> the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla.  Hopefully someone will start
to
> forward port the code base.

Did the contracts ever get submitted?  Your patch is still in the ecos
bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official
confirmation
from FSF.

Thanks,
Hartley

RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

[H Hartley Sweeten]

On Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:19 PM, Austin, Brian wrote:
>
> Crap!  Sorry guys,
> 
> I'll mail that off.
> 

Hello Brian,

Hate to be a pain but, did you ever get the paperwork submitted to the
FSF to transfer the copyright assignment for the Cirrus ep93xx eCos
port?

Thanks,
Hartley

-----Original Message-----
From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:11 PM
To: Austin, Brian
Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
eCos Maintainers
Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> 
>>> Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9
support?
>>>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would
it
>>>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly
clean
>>>>>> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the
patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>>>>
>>>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they
never
>>>> made an assignment.
>>>
>>> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
>>> timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't
have
>>> time to search right now).
>> 
>> 
>> Does anyone know the status of this?
>>
>> I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
>> original patch is still not in CVS.
>
> I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've
submitted an 
> assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or
they 
> never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask
Cirrus.

Hello Brian,

On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list:

> I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch
for
> the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla.  Hopefully someone will start
to
> forward port the code base.

Did the contracts ever get submitted?  Your patch is still in the ecos
bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official
confirmation
from FSF.

Thanks,
Hartley

RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

[Austin, Brian]

Hey guys,

I have been trying to find the paper work to mail off to the FSF, but
cant find it.  Legal gave it the go ahead.

I totally folded on this and am sorry,

Can you point me to the person at the FSF to resend me the paper work,
so I can sign it and send it off.

Sorry again for the fowlup.

Brian Austin

-----Original Message-----
From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:30 AM
To: Austin, Brian
Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
eCos Maintainers
Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

On Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:19 PM, Austin, Brian wrote:
>
> Crap!  Sorry guys,
> 
> I'll mail that off.
> 

Hello Brian,

Hate to be a pain but, did you ever get the paperwork submitted to the
FSF to transfer the copyright assignment for the Cirrus ep93xx eCos
port?

Thanks,
Hartley

-----Original Message-----
From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:11 PM
To: Austin, Brian
Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
eCos Maintainers
Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> 
>>> Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9
support?
>>>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would
it
>>>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly
clean
>>>>>> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the
patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>>>>
>>>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they
never
>>>> made an assignment.
>>>
>>> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
>>> timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't
have
>>> time to search right now).
>> 
>> 
>> Does anyone know the status of this?
>>
>> I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
>> original patch is still not in CVS.
>
> I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've
submitted an 
> assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or
they 
> never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask
Cirrus.

Hello Brian,

On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list:

> I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch
for
> the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla.  Hopefully someone will start
to
> forward port the code base.

Did the contracts ever get submitted?  Your patch is still in the ecos
bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official
confirmation
from FSF.

Thanks,
Hartley

Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

[Jonathan Larmour]

Austin, Brian wrote:
> Hey guys,
> 
> I have been trying to find the paper work to mail off to the FSF, but
> cant find it.  Legal gave it the go ahead.
> 
> I totally folded on this and am sorry,
> 
> Can you point me to the person at the FSF to resend me the paper work,
> so I can sign it and send it off.

Hi Brian,

This page gives you the form you need to fill in, and the email address 
for it go to. They'll then send you the paperwork again.

http://ecos.sourceware.org/ecos/assign.html

Thanks for contributing!

Jifl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:30 AM
> To: Austin, Brian
> Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
> eCos Maintainers
> Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
> 
> On Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:19 PM, Austin, Brian wrote:
> 
>>Crap!  Sorry guys,
>>
>>I'll mail that off.
>>
> 
> 
> Hello Brian,
> 
> Hate to be a pain but, did you ever get the paperwork submitted to the
> FSF to transfer the copyright assignment for the Cirrus ep93xx eCos
> port?
> 
> Thanks,
> Hartley
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:11 PM
> To: Austin, Brian
> Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
> eCos Maintainers
> Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
> 
> On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> 
>>H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>
>>>On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hello all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9
> 
> support?
> 
>>>>>>>http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would
> 
> it
> 
>>>>>>>be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>>>>>CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly
> 
> clean
> 
>>>>>>>except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the
> 
> patch.
> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>>>>>
>>>>>Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they
> 
> never
> 
>>>>>made an assignment.
>>>>
>>>>They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
>>>>timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't
> 
> have
> 
>>>>time to search right now).
>>>
>>>
>>>Does anyone know the status of this?
>>>
>>>I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
>>>original patch is still not in CVS.
>>
>>I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've
> 
> submitted an 
> 
>>assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or
> 
> they 
> 
>>never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask
> 
> Cirrus.
> 
> Hello Brian,
> 
> On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list:
> 
> 
>>I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch
> 
> for
> 
>>the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla.  Hopefully someone will start
> 
> to
> 
>>forward port the code base.
> 
> 
> Did the contracts ever get submitted?  Your patch is still in the ecos
> bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official
> confirmation
> from FSF.
> 
> Thanks,
> Hartley
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine

RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

[H Hartley Sweeten]

Hello Brian,

Any update on this?

Regards,
Hartley 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Larmour [mailto:jifl@jifvik.org] 
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 11:38 AM
To: Austin, Brian
Cc: H Hartley Sweeten; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org; eCos Maintainers
Subject: Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

Austin, Brian wrote:
> Hey guys,
> 
> I have been trying to find the paper work to mail off to the FSF, but
> cant find it.  Legal gave it the go ahead.
> 
> I totally folded on this and am sorry,
> 
> Can you point me to the person at the FSF to resend me the paper work,
> so I can sign it and send it off.

Hi Brian,

This page gives you the form you need to fill in, and the email address 
for it go to. They'll then send you the paperwork again.

http://ecos.sourceware.org/ecos/assign.html

Thanks for contributing!

Jifl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:30 AM
> To: Austin, Brian
> Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
> eCos Maintainers
> Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
> 
> On Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:19 PM, Austin, Brian wrote:
> 
>>Crap!  Sorry guys,
>>
>>I'll mail that off.
>>
> 
> 
> Hello Brian,
> 
> Hate to be a pain but, did you ever get the paperwork submitted to the
> FSF to transfer the copyright assignment for the Cirrus ep93xx eCos
> port?
> 
> Thanks,
> Hartley
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:11 PM
> To: Austin, Brian
> Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
> eCos Maintainers
> Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
> 
> On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> 
>>H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>
>>>On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hello all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9
> 
> support?
> 
>>>>>>>http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would
> 
> it
> 
>>>>>>>be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>>>>>CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly
> 
> clean
> 
>>>>>>>except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the
> 
> patch.
> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>>>>>
>>>>>Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they
> 
> never
> 
>>>>>made an assignment.
>>>>
>>>>They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
>>>>timeframe, maybe a bit later.  It should be in the logs (I don't
> 
> have
> 
>>>>time to search right now).
>>>
>>>
>>>Does anyone know the status of this?
>>>
>>>I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
>>>original patch is still not in CVS.
>>
>>I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've
> 
> submitted an 
> 
>>assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or
> 
> they 
> 
>>never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask
> 
> Cirrus.
> 
> Hello Brian,
> 
> On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list:
> 
> 
>>I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch
> 
> for
> 
>>the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla.  Hopefully someone will start
> 
> to
> 
>>forward port the code base.
> 
> 
> Did the contracts ever get submitted?  Your patch is still in the ecos
> bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official
> confirmation
> from FSF.
> 
> Thanks,
> Hartley
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine

Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

[Evgeniy Dushistov]

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 02:15:17PM -0400, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support?
> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
> 
> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would it
> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly clean
> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the patch.
> 

If you are working on this, better support of ep93xx (I used ep9315),
we can merge our forces. Recently I start working with custom
board which used ep9315, and see several possible improvements of
current patch:

- macroses/functions to work with egpio 
- make the way of configuration of MMU more easy, like in others
arm9 ports, not in asm code as now

-- 
/Evgeniy

RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

[H Hartley Sweeten]

On Saturday, September 19, 2009 11:48 AM, Evgeniy Dushistov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 02:15:17PM -0400, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> 
>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support?
>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>> 
>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed?  If so, would it
>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up?  The diff appears fairly clean
>> except for a couple of issues.  Following are the files in the patch.
>> 
>
> If you are working on this, better support of ep93xx (I used ep9315),
> we can merge our forces. Recently I start working with custom
> board which used ep9315, and see several possible improvements of
> current patch:
>
> - macroses/functions to work with egpio 
> - make the way of configuration of MMU more easy, like in others
> arm9 ports, not in asm code as now

Hello,

The original patch still needs to get merged into CVS.  I think
Brian Austin at Cirrus finally got the information sent off to
FSF.  Hopefully that process does not take forever...

I have been maintaining a local branch of the port for my use
for quite a while.  It's current to the last CVS update I did
on 9/16/2009.  The port works fine but my source would need some
cleanup in order to get merged into the CVS, mostly for style
issues.

I have looked at implementing a gpio system for the ep93xx.  I'm
just not sure where this would go into ecos.  I have also cleaned
up the SPI access functions in the Ethernet driver and started
looking at a true SPI driver.  I did dump all the Cirrus pkgconf
files a while back and just put in what I needed for my board.
The original files will need to be added back and cleaned up.

Most of my changes to the original port were done simply because
I couldn't follow what Cirrus was doing ;-).  My need is only
for RedBoot but I would be glad to help with anything that I can.
A lot of ecos I really don't "get" so bear with me...

If you want I can send you a diff of what I have right now.  It
might not all be "right" but RedBoot does at least work.

Regards,
Hartley

Re: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support

[Evgeniy Dushistov]

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 02:45:50PM -0400, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> Most of my changes to the original port were done simply because
> I couldn't follow what Cirrus was doing ;-).  My need is only
> for RedBoot but I would be glad to help with anything that I can.
> A lot of ecos I really don't "get" so bear with me...
> 
> If you want I can send you a diff of what I have right now.  It
> might not all be "right" but RedBoot does at least work.
> 

I want :)
I get working redboot on my custom board too,
but may be I missed something.


-- 
/Evgeniy