From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12055 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2009 06:56:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 12044 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Aug 2009 06:56:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (HELO mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com) (81.103.221.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:56:10 +0000 Received: from aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20090826065534.ZIZF5579.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:55:34 +0100 Received: from cog.dallaway.org.uk ([86.9.207.237]) by aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20090826065534.HXGM13254.aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@cog.dallaway.org.uk>; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:55:34 +0100 Received: from cog.dallaway.org.uk (cog.dallaway.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) by cog.dallaway.org.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7Q6tVpi019762; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:55:31 +0100 Message-ID: <4A94DC63.7070407@dallaway.org.uk> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:56:00 -0000 From: John Dallaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090625) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Kallweit CC: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: crc16 accumulate patch References: <4A8E9A8F.3040602@intefo.ch> <4A944F33.3060100@dallaway.org.uk> <4A94D77C.4040405@intefo.ch> In-Reply-To: <4A94D77C.4040405@intefo.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 Hi Simon Simon Kallweit wrote: > John Dallaway wrote: >> Hi Simon >> >> Simon Kallweit wrote: >> >>> I have already sent in this patch some months ago, but it has not been >>> accepted. So I try again. This patch will add a new method >>> crc16_accumulate() and brings the API for crc16 in line with the others >>> which already support accumulation. There is no change to the >>> existing API. >> >> Can you extend the CRC test to exercise cyg_crc16_accumulate() in a >> similar way to cyg_crc32_accumulate() please? > > Done, also updated the ChangeLog. Checked-in. Thank you for the contribution! John Dallaway