From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17334 invoked by alias); 17 May 2010 07:23:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 17324 invoked by uid 22791); 17 May 2010 07:23:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from lo.gmane.org (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 May 2010 07:23:13 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ODufM-0005CI-VC for ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 17 May 2010 09:23:08 +0200 Received: from 90-231-88-61-no84.business.telia.com ([90.231.88.61]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 09:23:08 +0200 Received: from daniel.neri by 90-231-88-61-no84.business.telia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 09:23:08 +0200 To: ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com connect(): No such file or directory From: daniel.neri@sigicom.com (Daniel =?utf-8?Q?N=C3=A9ri?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] when building using binutils 2.20: Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 07:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <87ljbjhu0a.fsf@quadra.hq.sigicom.net> References: <4BE012A5.1050907@spen-soft.co.uk> <4BEAA92D.70807@jifvik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 Jonathan Larmour writes: > I'll let Nick handle this patch, but I'm curious (and admittedly > haven't looked at the ISA details): it seems strange that msr psp,sp > used to be allowed but now is not - and presumably it worked on the > hardware otherwise it wouldn't have been in the port. Over the weekend I tried to build a new ARM toolchain with binutils 2.20.1 and GCC 4.3.4, and it failed on code generated for ARMv7 by GCC itself, with GAS complaining about the use of R13. Downgrading to binutils 2.19.1 helped. Regards, Daniel