RE: AT91 ADC support

["Christophe Coutand" <ccoutand@stmi.com>]

Hi Sergei,

Thanks. Additionally, can you clarify something for me. When updating
the eCos documentation, are the SGML files part of the source code
repository used to generate the HTML version of the documentation? Or
should both be updated separately?

Regards,
Christophe  

-----Original Message-----
From: Sergei Gavrikov [mailto:sergei.gavrikov@gmail.com] 
Sent: 30. mai 2010 12:34
To: John Dallaway
Cc: Christophe Coutand; eCos Patches
Subject: Re: AT91 ADC support

Hi

Now checked-in. Christophe, thank you for your contribution! John - for 
your assistance! And your patience (well, you know ;-)

Sergei

On Sat, 29 May 2010, John Dallaway wrote:
> Hi Sergei
>
> Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
>
>> Excuse, that took a bit more time for testing. So, with the latest
sent
>> stuff, it's possible to build ADC driver and ADC tests for the next
AT91
>> targets
>>
>>   at91sam7sek: SUCCESS
>>   at91sam7xek: SUCCESS
>>   sam7ex256: SUCCESS
>>   eb55: SUCCESS
>>   phycore: SUCCESS
>>
>> I'm personally do not see any pit stops which would block a check-in
the
>> latest version of the driver. Christophe, thank you for your time and
>> contribution. John?
>
> I have no objections. My concern was that we avoid an unquantified
delay
> in checking-in Christophe's contribution.
>
> Thank you for sorting this out...
>
> John Dallaway
> eCos maintainer