From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17799 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2010 14:13:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 17790 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Oct 2010 14:13:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.stmi.com (HELO mail.stmi.com) (70.169.254.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:13:28 +0000 X-Ninja-PIM: Scanned by Ninja X-Ninja-AttachmentFiltering: (no action) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: USB mass storage package (slave side). Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4CBC54B2.3020906@dallaway.org.uk> References: <4CBC437F.8080708@dallaway.org.uk> <4CBC54B2.3020906@dallaway.org.uk> From: "Christophe Coutand" To: "John Dallaway" Cc: , "Chris Holgate" , "Ilija Stanislevik" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2 Hi John, Bugzilla report was previously created: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1000987 I will upload an updated patch. Christophe -----Original Message----- From: John Dallaway [mailto:john@dallaway.org.uk]=20 Sent: 18. oktober 2010 16:08 To: Christophe Coutand Cc: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org; Chris Holgate; Ilija Stanislevik Subject: Re: USB mass storage package (slave side). Hi Christophe Christophe Coutand wrote: > Calling USB endpoint with their devtab entry name ( .e.g. /dev/usbsX ) > was meant to be more user friendly but can be easily changed. I guess > that is the meaning of the new USB API as well. The new API is intended to provide more flexibility for modern USB slave hardware (dynamic endpoint configuration). > Note that the patch is missing a file for some reason ( usbs_msd_scsi.h > ). I can generate a new patch, shall I remove the dependency towards the > endpoint devtab entry? If you have time to remove the dependency on endpoint devtab entries, that would be great. Also, could you raise a new bugzilla report at http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org for your contribution? It's much easier to track patches and the discussion about them in Bugzilla. To be clear, the new USB API presented at: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1001024 is not yet formalised, but any future changes required to use the new API should be independent of work to remove the dependency on endpoint devtab entries within your MSD function driver package. Thank you John Dallaway eCos maintainer