From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23480 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2010 17:57:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 23466 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Nov 2010 17:57:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ew0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f47.google.com) (209.85.215.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:57:12 +0000 Received: by ewy2 with SMTP id 2so1807846ewy.20 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.28.8 with SMTP id k8mr1749569ebc.12.1288979829620; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sg-laptop.local ([93.85.203.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v51sm1260798eeh.4.2010.11.05.10.57.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:57:00 -0000 From: Sergei Gavrikov To: Jean-Francois Argentino cc: ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: bsp for Olimex LPC-L2294-8M In-Reply-To: <4CD3EB1B.3000709@osean.fr> Message-ID: References: <4CD3EB1B.3000709@osean.fr> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, Jean-Francois Argentino wrote: > Hello, > > Following is a patch to support the OLIMEX LPC-L2294-8M development > board: same as LPC-L2294-1M with 8Mbytes of RAM (2 x SAMSUNG > K1S321611C) and 4M of FLASH (INTEL TE28F320C3BD70). > I don't have a LPC-L2294-1M, so I'm not sure if it has broken > something. Be aware that this is my 1st contact with eCos, maybe > there's a better way to do this. Salut, Thank you for your contribution to eCos. Sure, you can send the patches on this list, however, today's preferred method is to submit the patches through an eCos Bugzilla Engine: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Jean-Francois, although your patch(es) is/are small enough, it exceeds that "ten lines limit" to incorporate the patch(es) without a Copyright assignment (CA). Read, please, more about eCos CA needs and points here: http://ecos.sourceware.org/contrib.html I think that to start a process to get CA from FSF is good idea as your both patches (the second is a fix for one FLASH device driver) have TODO lines :-) One thought according the selected name for CDL to manage a hardware variant for the target (CYGPKG_HAL_ARM_LPC2XXX_OLPCL2294_RAMSIZE), for my taste CDL name to distinguish hardware would be something like CYGHWR_HAL_ARM_LPC2XXX_OLPCL2294_VARIANT and using such an option you could enter the changes in HAL startup code and in the target's flash device driver. So, could you, please, re-submit the patch(es) for eCos Bugzilla system and start the process of obtaining CA (if you can)? At the least, I will be able to test your changes for 8M variant on OLPCL2294-1M target then. Je vous remercie, Sergei