From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27101 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2013 15:19:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 27092 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Mar 2013 15:19:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:19:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91D34680014 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:19:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Z-cNgou55ET; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:19:27 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001649] AT91 hal extension Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:19:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: high X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email, use the link below. http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001649 --- Comment #16 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to comment #14) > Since John Dallaway is involved in bug 1000819 that may be or become related > to this bug, I'm putting him on CC list. Hello Ilija, I am aware of this patch, but IMHO that work was concentrating too much on re-structuring other ports, while it never made any progress on the processor support. It should be fairly simple to add ports for AT91SAM9263 or AT91SAM9X25 to this code base, if some one would like to do that. Bernd. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.