From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12522 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2013 16:56:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 12242 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Mar 2013 16:56:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:56:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534674680014 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:56:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BkqHU9CZcU6I; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:56:28 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001649] AT91 hal extension Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: ilijak@siva.com.mk X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: high X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email, use the link below. http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001649 Ilija Kocho changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ilijak@siva.com.mk --- Comment #13 from Ilija Kocho --- Bernd The attachment 1934 seem to have pretty much ARM9 architecure patches. Could architecture stuff be isolated in a separate bug? If we could integrate the AT91 support independently of architecture it would be much simpler, cleaner and safer process. Ilija -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.