From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15474 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2013 14:25:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 15456 invoked by uid 89); 9 Dec 2013 14:25:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail.ecoscentric.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:25:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161B4468000B for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 14:24:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TvBoNPINyoJ3; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 14:24:48 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001656] FreeBSD: add AF_PACKET socket familiy Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:25:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.zebralla@arcor.de X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: high X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email, use the link below. http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001656 --- Comment #13 from D.Zebralla --- After the first quick test: Yes, it looks like the IPv6 UDP packet is now sent. However, I am wondering if it's really the right thing to stuff padding bytes into sockaddr_in6. I am not familiar with the whole networking code stuff, but I saw that in the Windows world and partly in various unix flavors 28 Bytes for sockaddr_in6 or even little less seem common. Is there any RFC, ISO or POSIX standard where it's said that these structures should have the same size? What about this sockaddr_storage struct? On a sidenote: Why was there even a 'len'-parameter in bsd_bind() when it was not used up until your patch? Thanks in advance! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.