From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8799 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2013 13:52:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8789 invoked by uid 89); 7 Apr 2013 13:52:13 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:52:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282804680008 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 14:52:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vvrRZFWZqL2Y; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 14:52:01 +0100 (BST) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001814] Kinetis clock gating Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:52:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: mjones@linear.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: low X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email, use the link below. http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001814 --- Comment #22 from Mike Jones --- The buffer is not permanent. There are three buffers, and data is processed from SD, to B1, from B1 to B2, etc. To do it in chunks means the algorithm has to be aware of boundary conditions. So it has to be modified to align dynamically sized records with memory size and the state machine has to handle a stream of chunks rather than operate out of one big chunk. It is far more memory efficient to change the algorithm which needed to be changed anyway. It is more a matter of schedules than what is the right thing to do. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.