From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4223 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2013 12:53:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4177 invoked by uid 89); 3 Sep 2013 12:53:46 -0000 Received: from hagrid.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 12:53:46 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail.ecoscentric.com Received: from localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86C14680012 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:53:42 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hagrid.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QpYkccZHbmNS; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:53:37 +0100 (BST) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [Bug 1001897] lpc2xxx CAN driver improvements / enhancements Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 12:53:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: eCos X-Bugzilla-Component: Patches and contributions X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: sergei.gavrikov@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: low X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned@bugs.ecos.sourceware.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 Please do not reply to this email, use the link below. http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001897 --- Comment #14 from Sergei Gavrikov --- (In reply to comment #12) > FYI I obtained documents from NXP stating that the LPC1765 CAN cell is > exactly the same one than on the LPC2xxx, that conformance tests have > been done by NXP on the LPC2XXX ... Bernard, thank you for persistence. Q: But the same with which parts (LPC2XXX, LPC2XXX/00, LPC2XXX/01)? https://encrypted.google.com/search?q=lpc2294+errata I see 3 errata sheets for LPC2294 (LPC2XXX and LPC2XXX/00 parts have 7 CAN.1-CAN.7 erratums; LPC2XXX/01 parts have only one - CAN.1). Perhaps, CAN cells on LPC17XX are more modern. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.