From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21884 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2008 20:31:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 21874 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Oct 2008 20:31:15 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com (HELO yw-out-1718.google.com) (74.125.46.152) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:31:11 +0000 Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 9so71266ywk.66 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:31:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=UjZVyh26rbxP1Vw8XmbLEFOwVyBxn8JTRl3TWOENE+w=; b=i/xB0wqs4JguAQQu8hKpoLih2i2mU8esvxwJCbin65EL3UOwpWd1cdoJEGGwRpFZ0L qD13PE3USIrhVlVJeyTCcazer617PlfFkNSo308yjtJvFD7S7z8alubcOHUKCJzDdFph akXZq6Rt+WCbANagYJ3MczhyBPD7zKG9ghSF0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=ubFGYnkvUndGIvGWr/4CVpuk1/fC7sGjNJ0YwaMnFcc5rZFjsfYqka13ydsvjGleUp pcZXDRrwvm2lf42knHrXdq5XN8AIK7YIuPU0/3w9KjwlcHGPZ+TAoy9UCoh8aTjxvIWz flwsOzfjp5E2GVbAuV1IeLus3G+RdkVbue6PE= Received: by 10.142.207.8 with SMTP id e8mr4214258wfg.281.1225312268647; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.233.13 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:31:00 -0000 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8yvind_Harboe?=" To: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: profiling patch ping MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: d81a1c1e34244e01 Mailing-List: contact ecos-patches-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-patches-owner@ecos.sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 Is there something wrong with this patch? Not important enough? I don't want to nag, but it would be helpful to know at which point I should assume "communication by default", i.e. that nobody responded because it is of no interest to any maintainer in particular or that it was "not even wrong"... http://sourceware.org/ml/ecos-patches/2008-10/msg00007.html I don't need this committed to CVS as such, I always have half a dozen modifications to eCos repository at any moment in time and that works great. Open source is neat that way. Only the modifications of interest to the community are actually committed. The rest can stay in local snapshots of repositories(sometimes even project specific or even development branch specific), but it is nice to keep it to half a dozen over time(i.e. that some patches get committed occasionally). --=20 =D8yvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer