profiling patch ping

profiling patch ping

[Øyvind Harboe]

Is there something wrong with this patch?

Not important enough?

I don't want to nag, but it would be helpful to know at which point
I should assume "communication by default", i.e. that nobody responded
because it is of no interest to any maintainer in particular or that
it was "not even wrong"...

http://sourceware.org/ml/ecos-patches/2008-10/msg00007.html

I don't need this committed to CVS as such, I always have half a dozen
modifications to eCos repository at any moment in time and that works
great. Open source is neat that way. Only the modifications of interest
to the community are actually committed. The rest can stay in local
snapshots of repositories(sometimes even project specific or
even development branch specific), but it is nice to keep it to half
a dozen over time(i.e. that some patches get committed
occasionally).

-- 
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer

Re: profiling patch ping

[Andrew Lunn]

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 09:31:08PM +0100, ?yvind Harboe wrote:
> Is there something wrong with this patch?

I did take a quick look at it at the time. The comments did not seem
to agree with the patch. So i decided it needed i needed to look at it
in more detail. 

I have a backlog of patches which need dealing with. So maybe Saturday
will be the day for clearing out this backlog.

     Andrew

Re: profiling patch ping

[Øyvind Harboe]

> I have a backlog of patches which need dealing with. So maybe Saturday
> will be the day for clearing out this backlog.

No rush with this patch, definitely not sunny Saturday stuff! :-)

Just checking on the process with patches in general.

You were right not to commit this patch right away given that
it is somewhat controdictionary in the comment.

I'll dig into it and probably submit a new and improved patch.



-- 
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer