On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 15:26 -0400, Conrad Rad wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Conrad Rad <cse.cem@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This should be 0, 0x8. The size goes in the *size, return value of
> > dwarf_aggregate_size() should be zero on success, not 8. The patch is
> > not good as is.
> >
> With the fixed patch (attached), it works:

Oops. That shows why I shouldn't submit patches without testcases...
Thanks for testing and fixing.

Here is the fixed up patch plus some testcases to show it actually
works.

Cheers,

Mark