From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5613675210672131656=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
To: elfutils-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: Fuzzing elfutils
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:08:09 +0100
Message-ID: <1418386089.31868.0.camel@bordewijk.wildebeest.org>
In-Reply-To: 1418030061.18974.29.camel@bordewijk.wildebeest.org

--===============5613675210672131656==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 10:14 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 04:01 +0300, Alexander Cherepanov wrote:
> > On 2014-12-04 19:03, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > Good news, the asserts from readelf-asserts.tar.gz don't trigger anym=
ore
> > > and the command seems to run fine.
> > =

> > Sorry, I'm still seeing "readelf: readelf.c:7751: =

> > print_debug_exception_table: Assertion `readp =3D=3D action_table' fail=
ed." =

> > on 437b7cf1.
> =

> Right, sorry, I didn't include -e in my tests.
> The assert is "right" the Action Table should immediately follow the
> Call site table. But we should just report invalid data if that isn't
> the case instead of asserting.
> =

> Patch attached (and on the mjw/pending branch).

Patch pushed to master now.

--===============5613675210672131656==--