From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5043551208408617696=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: elfutils-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libebl: Add ebl_unwind_ret_mask.
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 12:39:44 +0200
Message-ID: <20140615103944.GA1555@roeckx.be>
In-Reply-To: 1402828202-30585-1-git-send-email-mjw@redhat.com

--===============5043551208408617696==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 12:30:02PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Another ARM oddity. A return value address in an unwind will contain an
> extra bit to indicate whether to return to a regular ARM or THUMB functio=
n.
> Add a new ebl function to return a mask to use to get the actual return
> address during an unwind ebl_unwind_ret_mask.

Does this fix all the issues on armhf now, including the
backtrace?


Kurt


--===============5043551208408617696==--