On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 12:30:02PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> +  /* Mask to use to get the return address from an unwind in case the
> +     architecture adds some extra non-address bits to it.  When not
> +     initialized (0) then ebl_unwind_ret_mask will return ~0, otherwise
> +     it should be the actual mask to use.  */
> +  GElf_Addr unwind_ret_mask;

Shouldn't that be an Elf64_Addr?


Kurt