From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3121004950297171844=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
To: elfutils-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add is_executable to Dwfl_Module.
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:55:34 -0700
Message-ID: <20140909215534.88CD12C39D8@topped-with-meat.com>
In-Reply-To: 20140909215150.GA16300@host2.jankratochvil.net

--===============3121004950297171844==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>    int segment;			/* Index of first segment table entry.  */
>    bool gc;			/* Mark/sweep flag.  */
> +  bool is_executable : 1;	/* Use Dwfl::executable_for_core?  */

If you're going to use a bitfield, then make every other bool in that
struct a bitfield too.  But it's not usually worthwhile.  It's
premature microoptimization that privileges memory over CPU, which
might not even be the right tradeoff any more.

--===============3121004950297171844==--