From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3864221703812906081==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Kurt Roeckx To: elfutils-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Subject: Re: dwfl_thread_getframes: no matching address range Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 22:34:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20151227213418.GA31464@roeckx.be> In-Reply-To: 20151227203819.GD2790@blokker.redhat.com --===============3864221703812906081== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 09:38:19PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > (Replied from my other email address, since it seems the list > isn't accepting my home email address for some reason.) > = > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 07:29:03PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > So it seems that something on the system changed causing the > > breakage. > = > Found it. It is two things. > = > 1) For some architectures (the ones that fail) debian glibc seems to > have not been compiled with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables. This really > should be the default on all arches since otherwise various programs > will be unable to unwind/backtrace through all libraries. I believe > there was already a bug filed against gcc for this, but I cannot find > it now. I already filed 2 bugs for this: https://bugs.debian.org/746426 (gcc, you replied to it) https://bugs.debian.org/746516 (glibc) Kurt --===============3864221703812906081==--