public inbox for elfutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Milian Wolff <mail@milianw.de>
Cc: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org, Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>,
	Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
Subject: Re: frame unwinding patches
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 07:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170404075532.GA11810@host1.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2050042.dvQtNuZMzI@milian-kdab2>

On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 09:40:06 +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> - In the example above, the address points into libnvidia-glcore.so and as 
> such not compiled by my colleague but rather provided by NVidia as a binary 
> blob. When you only got a binary blob and have to make do with it, you cannot 
> tell people to "just fix the compiler invocation".

This is their problem they support a vendor who cripples usage of their
products.  There is also Intel and AMD.


> - Some JIT compilers, like QV4, actually embed frame pointers into their 
> dynamic code, but do not go the extra mile for generating DWARF data or 
> asynchronous unwind tables. That is another case where the patches by Ulf 
> excel and make elfutils much more useful.

In such case elfutils could provide some workaround with a new eu-stack option:
	--please-workaround-a-completely-broken-compiler-i-still-have-not-fixed
:-)


Jan

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-04  7:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-15 23:34 Mark Wielaard
2017-02-15 23:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] Add frame pointer unwinding for aarch64 Mark Wielaard
2017-02-15 23:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] Add frame pointer unwinding as fallback on x86_64 Mark Wielaard
2017-02-15 23:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add frame pointer unwinding as fallback on arm Mark Wielaard
2017-02-16  9:13 ` frame unwinding patches Ulf Hermann
2017-04-03  9:00 ` Milian Wolff
2017-04-03  9:03   ` Ulf Hermann
2017-04-03 21:14     ` Mark Wielaard
2017-04-07 10:27       ` Mark Wielaard
2017-04-11 10:16         ` Ulf Hermann
2017-04-19 19:48           ` Mark Wielaard
2017-04-20  9:26             ` Ulf Hermann
2017-04-25 12:50               ` Mark Wielaard
2017-04-25 12:54                 ` [PATCH 1/5] Revert "Optionally allow unknown symbols in the backtrace tests" Mark Wielaard
2017-04-25 12:50                   ` [PATCH 2/5] tests: Add core backtracegen chec and regenerate ppc32 backtrace test files Mark Wielaard
2017-04-25 13:04                     ` Ulf Hermann
2017-04-25 12:55                   ` [PATCH 3/5] Add frame pointer unwinding as fallback on x86_64 Mark Wielaard
2017-04-25 13:05                     ` Ulf Hermann
2017-04-25 12:56                   ` [PATCH 4/5] Add i386 frame pointer unwinder Mark Wielaard
2017-04-25 13:38                     ` Ulf Hermann
2017-04-25 12:56                   ` [PATCH 1/5] Revert "Optionally allow unknown symbols in the backtrace tests" Ulf Hermann
2017-04-25 13:11                   ` [PATCH 5/5] Add frame pointer unwinding for aarch64 Mark Wielaard
2017-04-25 21:55                     ` Ulf Hermann
2017-04-25 22:13                     ` Mark Wielaard
2017-04-25 22:23                       ` Ulf Hermann
2017-04-26 15:24                         ` Mark Wielaard
2017-04-27 14:02                           ` Ulf Hermann
2017-04-27 14:29                             ` Mark Wielaard
2017-04-27 14:35                               ` Ulf Hermann
2017-04-27 15:09                                 ` Mark Wielaard
2017-04-27 15:42                                   ` Ulf Hermann
2017-05-03  8:46                                 ` Mark Wielaard
2017-04-26 15:20                 ` frame unwinding patches Ulf Hermann
2017-04-03 21:23   ` Jan Kratochvil
2017-04-04  7:40     ` Milian Wolff
2017-04-04  7:55       ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2017-04-04  8:25         ` Ulf Hermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170404075532.GA11810@host1.jankratochvil.net \
    --to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=elfutils-devel@sourceware.org \
    --cc=mail@milianw.de \
    --cc=mark@klomp.org \
    --cc=ulf.hermann@qt.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).