public inbox for elfutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
Cc: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make elf section sorting more deterministic
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 11:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170502223010.GH3321@stream> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <355f6ed3-88b1-adf3-e2b0-7ba52589e4ea@qt.io>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2334 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:35:26PM +0200, Ulf Hermann wrote:
> On 04/27/2017 09:41 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:54:26PM +0200, Ulf Hermann wrote:
> >> At least one test (dwfl-addr-sect) depends on the order of elf sections
> >> with equal addresses. This is not guaranteed by the code. Compare also
> >> by end address and name to tell entries apart.
> > 
> > O, interesting find. If the start addresses match the order depends on
> > the specific qsort algorithm. So you need a real tie breaker.
> > 
> > I think it is simpler and more predictable if we just take the section
> > number into account. It seem to have the added benefit that it provide
> > the same ordering as before with the glibc qsort, so no testcases need
> > to be adjusted. Does the following work for you?
> > 
> > diff --git a/libdwfl/derelocate.c b/libdwfl/derelocate.c
> > index 439a24e..0d10672 100644
> > --- a/libdwfl/derelocate.c
> > +++ b/libdwfl/derelocate.c
> > @@ -63,7 +63,10 @@ compare_secrefs (const void *a, const void *b)
> >    if ((*p1)->start > (*p2)->start)
> >      return 1;
> >  
> > -  return 0;
> > +  /* Same start address, then just compare which section came first.  */
> > +  size_t n1 = elf_ndxscn ((*p1)->scn);
> > +  size_t n2 = elf_ndxscn ((*p2)->scn);
> > +  return n1 - n2;
> 
> I would inline the whole thing to
> 
> return elf_ndxscn (p1->scn) - elf_ndxscn (p2->scn);
> 
> There is no point in forcing the compiler to keep the intermediate
> numbers as (signed) size_t.

OK.

> Also, I would still keep the check for p1->end and p2->end before this.
> If we have a section of size 0, and another one of size > 0 starting at
> the same place, we want them to be sorted by end address. The zero-sized
> section should be squeezed in before the one that actually has a size,
> not after it.

Aha. I see that we treat the end special in find_section ()

          /* Consider the limit of a section to be inside it, unless it's
             inside the next one.  A section limit address can appear in
             line records.  */
          if (*addr == sections->refs[idx].end
              && idx + 1 < sections->count
              && *addr == sections->refs[idx + 1].start)
            ++idx;

So we do indeed want the zero sized section to be the first.

How about the attached?

Cheers,

Mark

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Make-elf-section-sorting-more-deterministic.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1706 bytes --]

From d7e1e08f68afd6c3363231e3100fa0124a2d5cb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:54:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Make elf section sorting more deterministic

At least one test (dwfl-addr-sect) depends on the order of elf sections
with equal addresses. This is not guaranteed by the code. Compare also
by end address and section index to tell entries apart.

Signed-off-by: Ulf Hermann <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
---
 libdwfl/ChangeLog    | 6 ++++++
 libdwfl/derelocate.c | 8 +++++++-
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/libdwfl/ChangeLog b/libdwfl/ChangeLog
index 859b2ff..9bce6b1 100644
--- a/libdwfl/ChangeLog
+++ b/libdwfl/ChangeLog
@@ -1,6 +1,12 @@
 2017-04-20  Ulf Hermann  <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
 	    Mark Wielaard  <mark@klomp.org>
 
+	* derelocate.c (compare_secrefs): Compare by end address and then by
+	section number if addresses are equal.
+
+2017-04-20  Ulf Hermann  <ulf.hermann@qt.io>
+	    Mark Wielaard  <mark@klomp.org>
+
 	* linux-kernel-modules.c: Always return NULL from kernel_release() on
 	non-linux systems and set errno to ENOTSUP.
 
diff --git a/libdwfl/derelocate.c b/libdwfl/derelocate.c
index e5c3e12..2f80b20 100644
--- a/libdwfl/derelocate.c
+++ b/libdwfl/derelocate.c
@@ -67,7 +67,13 @@ compare_secrefs (const void *a, const void *b)
   if ((*p1)->start > (*p2)->start)
     return 1;
 
-  return 0;
+  if ((*p1)->end < (*p2)->end)
+    return -1;
+  if ((*p1)->end > (*p2)->end)
+    return 1;
+
+  /* Same start/end, then just compare which section came first.  */
+  return elf_ndxscn ((*p1)->scn) - elf_ndxscn ((*p2)->scn);
 }
 
 static int
-- 
2.9.3


  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-02 22:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-20 14:54 Ulf Hermann
2017-04-28  0:35 ` Mark Wielaard
2017-04-28 11:21   ` Ulf Hermann
2017-05-03 11:04     ` Mark Wielaard [this message]
2017-05-03 11:08       ` Ulf Hermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170502223010.GH3321@stream \
    --to=mark@klomp.org \
    --cc=elfutils-devel@sourceware.org \
    --cc=ulf.hermann@qt.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).