From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 55982 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2017 08:11:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact elfutils-devel-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Sender: elfutils-devel-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 54906 invoked by uid 89); 19 Aug 2017 08:11:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.99.2 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:stream X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-HELO: gnu.wildebeest.org Received: from wildebeest.demon.nl (HELO gnu.wildebeest.org) (212.238.236.112) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 08:11:05 +0000 Received: from stream.wildebeest.org (ADijon-357-1-27-209.w109-217.abo.wanadoo.fr [109.217.50.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52DCF33138CE; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 10:11:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by stream.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8BF75101FC4; Fri, 18 Aug 2017 23:19:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 08:11:00 -0000 From: Mark Wielaard To: Ulf Hermann Cc: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Detect if symbol versioning is supported Message-ID: <20170818211929.GF3169@stream> References: <61a1af97-efd1-0d57-aa12-583aed97720d@qt.io> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <61a1af97-efd1-0d57-aa12-583aed97720d@qt.io> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-q3/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2 On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 03:50:42PM +0200, Ulf Hermann wrote: > If not, throw an error unless symbol versioning was explicitly > disabled. I am not sure supporting systems don't do symbol versioning is a very good thing to do. But since we do (hohum). It does make sense to explicitly check for it. Applied. Thanks, Mark