From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
To: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
Cc: arjan@linux.intel.com, patrick.mccarty@intel.com
Subject: contrasting elfutils debuginfod and clr-debug-info server
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 17:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200205173249.GD22246@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi -
Through some comments on phoronix [0], just became (re?)aware of the
neat clear-linux debuginfo server facility [1]. It's similar to the
nixos one we have mentioned before in that it relies on a local fuse
server expose remote debuginfo artifacts under /usr/src,
/usr/lib/debug etc. to local tools. The server side relies on a web
server [2] that has a carefully unpacked, unified-namespace tree of
all the artifacts into individual .tar files. This has some
pros/cons, naturally.
Some contrasts in a tabular form:
clear-linux elfutils
indexed by filename by buildid
client side sw fuse server apprx. none
server side sw plain file server debuginfod
server side disk unpacked, unified-namespace layout orig pkg set
multi-version maybe, if /usr/src/XXXX filenames unique no problem
multi-arch req. separate servers no problem
multi-distro req. separate servers one server ok
Neat system. I wonder how interoperation would work.
(cc:'ing a few clearlinux folks just for their information.)
[0] https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Red-Hat-FOSDEM-debuginfod
[1] https://docs.01.org/clearlinux/latest/guides/clear/debug.html
[2] https://download.clearlinux.org/debuginfo/
- FChE
next reply other threads:[~2020-02-05 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-05 17:33 Frank Ch. Eigler [this message]
2020-02-05 19:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2020-02-05 19:14 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2020-02-05 22:05 ` Arjan van de Ven
2020-02-07 9:13 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-02-07 14:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2020-02-07 23:47 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-02-09 17:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2020-02-07 9:06 ` Mark Wielaard
2020-02-07 14:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200205173249.GD22246@redhat.com \
--to=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=elfutils-devel@sourceware.org \
--cc=patrick.mccarty@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).