public inbox for elfutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luke Diamand <ldiamand@roku.com>
To: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>, Luke Diamand <ldiamand@roku.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 1/1] report_r_debug: handle `-z separate-code' and find more modules
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 20:11:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230512191145.936984-2-ldiamand@roku.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230512191145.936984-1-ldiamand@roku.com>

Looking at some cores in eu-stack, I found that they were not being
backtraced.

This was because elfutils had not found some modules (e.g. libc-2.22.so)
in report_r_debug.

That is because it has a limit on the number of link map entries it will
look at, to avoid loops in corrupted core files.

The example I found had:
- 36 elements
- 109 iterations

See also discussion here:

    https://sourceware.org/pipermail/elfutils-devel/2023q2/006149.html

Signed-off-by: Luke Diamand <ldiamand@roku.com>
---
 libdwfl/link_map.c | 14 ++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libdwfl/link_map.c b/libdwfl/link_map.c
index 06d85eb6..76f23354 100644
--- a/libdwfl/link_map.c
+++ b/libdwfl/link_map.c
@@ -331,11 +331,17 @@ report_r_debug (uint_fast8_t elfclass, uint_fast8_t elfdata,
   int result = 0;
 
   /* There can't be more elements in the link_map list than there are
-     segments.  DWFL->lookup_elts is probably twice that number, so it
-     is certainly above the upper bound.  If we iterate too many times,
-     there must be a loop in the pointers due to link_map clobberation.  */
+     segments.  A segment is created for each PT_LOAD and there can be
+     up to 5 per module (-z separate-code, tends to create four LOAD
+     segments, gold has -z text-unlikely-segment, which might result
+     in creating that number of load segments) DWFL->lookup_elts is
+     probably twice the number of modules, so that multiplied by max
+     PT_LOADs is certainly above the upper bound.  If we iterate too
+     many times, there must be a loop in the pointers due to link_map
+     clobberation.  */
+#define MAX_PT_LOAD 5
   size_t iterations = 0;
-  while (next != 0 && ++iterations < dwfl->lookup_elts)
+  while (next != 0 && ++iterations < dwfl->lookup_elts * MAX_PT_LOAD)
     {
       if (read_addrs (&memory_closure, elfclass, elfdata,
 		      &buffer, &buffer_available, next, &read_vaddr,
-- 
2.40.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-12 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-12 19:11 [PATCHv2 0/1] In report_r_debug, iterate more segments Luke Diamand
2023-05-12 19:11 ` Luke Diamand [this message]
2023-05-12 20:08   ` [PATCHv2 1/1] report_r_debug: handle `-z separate-code' and find more modules Mark Wielaard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230512191145.936984-2-ldiamand@roku.com \
    --to=ldiamand@roku.com \
    --cc=elfutils-devel@sourceware.org \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=mark@klomp.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).