From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: Aaron Merey <amerey@redhat.com>
Cc: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle DW_AT_decl_file 0
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 22:13:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240212211356.GI21691@gnu.wildebeest.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJDtP-RFEjpjS075vrS6wTmUgRXjARJLkkWsf=W06u-182KxdA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Aaron,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 01:16:30PM -0500, Aaron Merey wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 12:31 PM Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> wrote:
> > > (void) INTUSE(dwarf_getsrclines) (&CUDIE (cu), &lines, &nlines);
> > > - assert (cu->lines != NULL);
> > > }
> >
> > I see why would like to get rid of asserts in the code base.
> > But I believe the assert is valid. dwarf_getsrclines will check whether
> > cu->lines is NULL, in which case it tries to load the line table. It
> > then sets cu->lines to the newly parsed line table, or to -1 to
> > indicate there was an error parsing (or no) line table.
> > >
> > > - if (cu->lines == (void *) -1l)
> > > + if (cu->lines == NULL || cu->lines == (void *) -1l)
> > > {
> > > - /* If the file index is not zero, there must be file information
> > > - available. */
> > > - __libdw_seterrno (DWARF_E_INVALID_DWARF);
> > > + /* Line table could not be found. */
> > > return NULL;
> > > }
> >
> > Which means this is a change in behavior. Now if there was no line
> > table, or a problem parsing it, then no error is set, but NULL is
> > returned anyway. Which means using dwarf_errno or dwarf_errmsg after
> > dwarf_decl_file returns NULL doesn't work reliably anymore. Are you
> > sure libdw errno shouldn't be set to DWARF_E_INVALID_DWARF?
>
> My thinking was to rely on dwarf_getsrclines setting the libdw errno
> if an error occurred. If we always use DWARF_E_INVALID_DWARF then we
> might overwrite an error code that describes the failure more specifically.
Ah, yes. That makes sense. But because of caching dwarf_getsrclines
only sets an error on first try.
> If we want to ensure that the libdw errno is set whenever we reach this
> condition, we could check if dwarf_getsrclines set the errno. If it did,
> then just leave that errno set. If it didn't, then set errno to
> DWARF_E_INVALID_DWARF.
Good idea. Or we could (also) cache the error in the cu
(files_libdwerr?), that is what e.g. dwfl_module_getdwarf does
(see mod->dwerr). But I think either solution is more like a
redesign/factoring. And you might consider doing it separate from this
bug fix.
If you have time, you could then also look into this
(performance/caching) issue:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27405
"libdw_get_srcfiles should not imply srclines"
Cheers,
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-12 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-10 2:52 Aaron Merey
2024-02-12 17:31 ` Mark Wielaard
2024-02-12 18:16 ` Aaron Merey
2024-02-12 21:13 ` Mark Wielaard [this message]
2024-02-13 1:44 ` Aaron Merey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240212211356.GI21691@gnu.wildebeest.org \
--to=mark@klomp.org \
--cc=amerey@redhat.com \
--cc=elfutils-devel@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).