From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vmicros1.altlinux.org (vmicros1.altlinux.org [194.107.17.57]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5865B385840E for ; Fri, 10 May 2024 00:16:27 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 5865B385840E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=altlinux.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=altlinux.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 5865B385840E Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=194.107.17.57 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1715300276; cv=none; b=wEJsS6xo0gSAGJxh3ymJpqZfmBbkIaC3mWiBH6FkqD2RUE0XXM+mU7TxulbMdYo9e1SS8Ro/yVOr15iTcSMsYwVeQ+Cqleq0qRfJee19hF9RKOM2Lp3/HJ/F0Ys2r/f4n4etlBcTA6+9Mcs3cr3RqXS0W5eoiWDm3sQbWILFALI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1715300276; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/IsACVSJ0NejQavhQxsXC6i7jJMACrkFN5gXxlzwzEw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=HeN+G81SUaM2mxR4Wioq8nuK8MAI4zurWrUO8usYr9+K84z1NfLH1Kq3HmQl2ZgtpKiqlVR5B3k+Ikz1a9szm29W3cRNFznHGnAB3XDS88tKsoOIyul82q7klEwlpIRPEXiTDp1jt3lq6zKohUtkIhXXKuQkatI8nNB4r27SqQo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from mua.local.altlinux.org (mua.local.altlinux.org [192.168.1.14]) by vmicros1.altlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B5872C90B; Fri, 10 May 2024 03:16:26 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mua.local.altlinux.org (Postfix, from userid 508) id AF1D37CCB3A; Fri, 10 May 2024 03:16:26 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 03:16:26 +0300 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: Aaron Merey , elfutils-devel@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 'make coverage' when used with lcov version 2.0+ Message-ID: <20240510001626.GA17619@altlinux.org> References: <20240506204527.604074-1-amerey@redhat.com> <20240509215339.GA16854@altlinux.org> <20240509220805.GK19769@redhat.com> <20240509225924.GA17241@altlinux.org> <20240509230347.GA5939@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240509230347.GA5939@redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Frank, On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 07:03:47PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Hi - > > > > > What's the purpose of sending proposed patches to the mailing list > > > > if reviews are silently ignored? > > > > > > Please be collegial and don't exaggerate. > > > > The fact is that the review was silently ignored, which is, from my point > > of view, an extraordinary event, > > The review *singular*. And you can't know whether it was ignored, or > never received or missed or considered. Well, even if it happened unintentionally, it was ignored just the same as if it happened on purpose. I hope the technical reasons for that are now fixed, and won't cause any problems next time. > > [...] and request that the issue pointed out in the review to be > > properly addressed. > > May I suggest asking for that in a less accusatory and exaggerated > fashion next time. Note also that being "properly addressed" is up to > the discretion of the maintainers - one of whom is Aaron. Please note that elfutils is a community project, and the code in question was contributed a few years ago by myself, see commit 2a16a0fc7e353f8fcfc27a57710e008840297847. I'm glad the code duplication issue is now resolved. Frank, please reconsider your approach. Your comments are not just unhelpful and unproductive, they can actually discourage contributors which is the last thing one wants in a free software project. -- ldv