From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05092384474B for ; Fri, 10 May 2024 01:37:45 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 05092384474B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 05092384474B Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1715305067; cv=none; b=M+UPjNu85s5F99Y7pBYEw2LPZfFyl30vU8I8ag9E/GZLl5BBpXYB1bAYHTetomioUFSt8agUOSE01BHhfcwR0cNQjDKlyfbgC/x7eIh18dt8EptQV7IlWqFvkyTUYTc7XumY7hJqFN/Bi3BkuenU0g+yKAWPRVTO0XMPxGe9NjY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1715305067; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QZRR/OMz8XtM61zlSYfMVBiLucDcmmawWNcmaJ5mJew=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=NHF/Yl5Mzr6GnIiz5DxEyHjinLdtKB+zZ0i2Xpvneqd6w3A99m345g0kXOQ3vxfcShE3SjQnaYQvctTBQzt58FZWQU+K61M0SkvTCS5y9mh4Ty0pKvn+R6iFz6MwMaa/MZeBsQc07XVfHCE1YJFJN7+nCnzM5OBzXI+i7ZJ5aiY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1715305065; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KLyUmV8jlU5hdJBi4wj7lFeOssYfrIOlA4Tc7U9mb6A=; b=eDycKEhlHFx334JXlEWpEzZaGYC+iYGFfLWw/9fNo558tsgDv2N6tjJ4Ett7UukB4HvxXp E9YrII31RxI30rdVRcPA+pMUI4bFh4OcMhXTfF888bNGL+e+qUAljBqpDFlLV/4578a1P2 edI5zmVq2Sbw2Hb8jZN1CBbASNT8CPg= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-16-ZPVpLWzUOBaiLQlTjP9jMg-1; Thu, 09 May 2024 21:37:44 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ZPVpLWzUOBaiLQlTjP9jMg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF7E981227E; Fri, 10 May 2024 01:37:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.22.8.11]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDB651181DD4; Fri, 10 May 2024 01:37:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fche by redhat.com with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s5FCg-0001kD-Sn; Thu, 09 May 2024 21:37:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 21:37:42 -0400 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: "Dmitry V. Levin" Cc: Aaron Merey , elfutils-devel@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 'make coverage' when used with lcov version 2.0+ Message-ID: <20240510013742.GB5939@redhat.com> References: <20240506204527.604074-1-amerey@redhat.com> <20240509215339.GA16854@altlinux.org> <20240509220805.GK19769@redhat.com> <20240509225924.GA17241@altlinux.org> <20240509230347.GA5939@redhat.com> <20240510001626.GA17619@altlinux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20240510001626.GA17619@altlinux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.3 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi - > Well, even if it happened unintentionally, it was ignored just the same > as if it happened on purpose. I hope the technical reasons for that > are now fixed, and won't cause any problems next time. You have been in the open source community long enough to know that emails sometimes just get lost. It might happen again, and one one should not take too much offence. > Please note that elfutils is a community project, and the code in > question was contributed a few years ago by myself, see commit > 2a16a0fc7e353f8fcfc27a57710e008840297847. Yes, however we both know that this does not mean that a maintainer is required to affirmatively consult you (or anyone) on changes years after its contribution. > Frank, please reconsider your approach. Your comments are [...] I disagree. - FChE