public inbox for elfutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
Cc: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: ☠ Buildbot (Sourceware): elfutils - failed test (failure) (master)
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 15:07:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35e96cea1977db7aecaf5e8cf6412b87a48c1c38.camel@klomp.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230720113727.690FD3858C2B@sourceware.org>

Hi Sam,

I think only the last one can really be said to be "your issue".

On Thu, 2023-07-20 at 11:37 +0000, builder--- via Elfutils-devel wrote:
> A new failure has been detected on builder elfutils-centos-x86_64 while building elfutils.
> 
> Full details are available at:
>     https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/39/builds/212
> 
> Build state: failed test (failure)
> Revision: a78fc84d013f925c4bf8ab65eee123bc86fe8b39
> Worker: centos-x86_64
> Build Reason: (unknown)
> Blamelist: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
> 
> - 7: make check ( failure )
>     Logs:
>         - stdio: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/39/builds/212/steps/7/logs/stdio
>         - test-suite.log: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/39/builds/212/steps/7/logs/test-suite_log

This is odd. Certainly not caused by your patch:

FAIL: run-backtrace-native-core.sh
dwfl_thread_getframes: no matching address range
backtrace: backtrace.c:81: callback_verify: Assertion `seen_main'
failed.

This is a centos7 box/kernel. We have seen this before, but not
recently. It might just be a "buggy" core file generated.

> A new failure has been detected on builder elfutils-debian-ppc64 while building elfutils.
> 
> Full details are available at:
>     https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/63/builds/212
> 
> Build state: failed test (failure)
> Revision: a78fc84d013f925c4bf8ab65eee123bc86fe8b39
> Worker: debian-ppc64
> Build Reason: (unknown)
> Blamelist: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
> buildbot/#builders/63/builds/212/steps/6/logs/warnings__3_
> 
> - 7: make check ( failure )
>     Logs:
>         - stdio: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/63/builds/212/steps/7/logs/stdio
>         - test-suite.log: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/63/builds/212/steps/7/logs/test-suite_log
> 
> A new failure has been detected on builder elfutils-debian-testing-x86_64 while building elfutils.
> 
> Full details are available at:
>     https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/145/builds/172
> 
> Build state: failed test (failure) test (failure)
> Revision: a78fc84d013f925c4bf8ab65eee123bc86fe8b39
> Worker: bb1-1
> Build Reason: (unknown)
> Blamelist: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
> 
> - 7: make check ( failure )
>     Logs:
>         - stdio: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/145/builds/172/steps/7/logs/stdio
>         - test-suite.log: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/145/builds/172/steps/7/logs/test-suite_log

These two builder are both running debian testing, which picked up a
bad binutils:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils/20230713215808.GA11829@gnu.wildebeest.org/
Hopefully this gets resolved soon with a newer binutils snapshot.

> A build exception has been detected on builder elfutils-gentoo-sparc while building elfutils.
> 
> Full details are available at:
>     https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/225/builds/84
> 
> Build state: exception update (exception)
> Revision: (unknown)
> Worker: gentoo-sparc
> Build Reason: (unknown)
> Blamelist: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
> 
> Steps:
> 
> - 0: worker_preparation ( success )
> 
> - 1: set package name ( success )
> 
> - 2: git checkout ( exception )
>     Logs:
>         - stdio: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/225/builds/84/steps/2/logs/stdio
>         - err.text: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/225/builds/84/steps/2/logs/err_text
>         - err.html: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/225/builds/84/steps/2/logs/err_html
> 

This is your buildbot builder. Please kick it! :)

Cheers,

Mark

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-20 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-20 11:37 builder
2023-07-20 13:07 ` Mark Wielaard [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-11-02 22:34 builder
2023-11-02  1:35 builder
2023-11-02  3:22 ` Aaron Merey
2023-11-01 15:08 builder
2023-11-01 16:40 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-10-24 20:37 builder
2023-10-14 15:32 builder
2023-10-14 15:44 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-10-03 18:08 builder
2023-10-03 16:50 builder
2023-08-29 14:04 builder
2023-08-29 14:20 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-06-27 14:52 builder
2023-06-17  0:56 builder
2023-06-16 16:16 builder
2023-06-16 16:50 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-05-12 21:04 builder
2023-05-12 21:29 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-05-09 12:05 builder
2023-05-09 12:12 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-05-09 10:20 builder
2023-05-09 10:39 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-05-08 16:30 builder
2023-05-08 16:45 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-04-17 12:36 builder
2023-04-17 12:46 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-04-14 15:49 builder
2023-04-13 18:01 builder
2023-04-06 23:20 builder
2023-04-07 19:33 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-03-30 20:48 builder
2023-03-29 22:28 builder
2023-03-29 22:18 builder
2023-03-05 12:52 builder
2023-02-28 13:12 builder
2023-02-17 20:36 builder
2023-02-17 20:39 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-02-14 17:02 builder
2023-02-14 17:33 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-02-14 16:56 builder
2023-02-14 17:31 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-02-14 16:14 builder
2023-02-14 16:37 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-02-09 14:56 builder
2023-02-09 14:20 builder
2023-02-09 14:30 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-02-08 17:57 builder
2023-02-08 18:26 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-02-08  2:43 builder
2023-02-08  3:29 ` Aaron Merey
2023-02-08 12:23   ` Frank Ch. Eigler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=35e96cea1977db7aecaf5e8cf6412b87a48c1c38.camel@klomp.org \
    --to=mark@klomp.org \
    --cc=elfutils-devel@sourceware.org \
    --cc=sam@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).