From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Cc: Noah Sanci <nsanci@redhat.com>, elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [Bug debuginfod/27277] Describe retrieved files when verbose
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 12:04:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35f2073dfeed8f008d42a78bf60b7efcf13164eb.camel@klomp.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210805165402.GD4195@redhat.com>
Hi,
On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 12:54 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > I like the verbose http header output, but wish it was done earlier
> > instead of after the download. Maybe when we commit to an url, if
> > the
> > info is available then.
>
> What do you mean "done"? Printed?
Yes, since the actual download might take a bit, it is nice to see the
headers at the moment we commit to a server/download. aka here in the
source:
if (vfd >= 0 && !verbose_reported && committed_to >= 0)
{
bool pnl = (c->default_progressfn_printed_p && vfd == STDERR_FILENO);
dprintf (vfd, "%scommitted to url %d\n", pnl ? "\n" : "",
committed_to);
if (pnl)
c->default_progressfn_printed_p = 0;
verbose_reported = true;
}
Assuming we have the headers at that point of course.
Otherwise right after that when they become available (this is inside
the download loop).
> > The new X-FILE and X-ARCHIVE headers also seem useful.
> > One question about X-FILE, if it doesn't come from an archive, does
> > it
> > leak a file system path that might be "secret" on the server?
>
> Perhaps kind of sort of ... but since source files for such buildids
> are resolved only against the host filesystem, those same names will
> be there in all their glory in the DWARF. My guess is that public
> servers that care about such configuration privacy will be
> exclusively
> archive based.
Yeah, you are right, the DWARF debug files themselves already "expose"
those paths.
> > Why is X-FILE-SIZE != Content-Length ?
>
> Because Content-Length can be shorter due to compression
> transfer-encoding. It's the file size that governs local storage &
> DEBUGINFOD_MAXSIZE interaction.
Ah, of course, then it is indeed useful to have both headers.
> > I am less enthusiastic about the new
> > debuginfod_get_response_headers
> > interface. It seems not as useful since it only works if we haven't
> > already (negatively) cached the file and it is very free-form, do
> > we
> > guarantee any headers are there?
>
> Naturally we can't guarantee any headers, because they are at the
> pleasure of the server.
>
> > Could you provide a user story where this is used?
>
> Not really, beyond just printing the things for information purposes,
> but not wanting the whole DEBUGINFOD_VERBOSE=1 firehose. In the mid
> term, it could help systemd-coredumpctl type tools map buildids to
> actual distro artifact names, and enable paranoid
> federation/buildtree/checking type measures (where we may want to
> spot-check servers that buildids haven't been hijacked). Vague but I
> think there's something there.
Yes, I do think there is something there, but imho it is too vague and
fragile to be useful as is, especially since it depends on what is in
the cache.
> > Maybe this interface is more useful if it was done as a new active
> > query type (the HEAD query you mention in the commit message)?
>
> That in turn would require THREE new API functions or a stateful
> set_HEAD_mode_and_return_dev_null one and modifying the three main
> lookup functions.
Yes, it definitely is more work.
Cheers,
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-06 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-04 18:54 Noah Sanci
2021-08-05 15:13 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-08-05 16:54 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2021-08-06 10:04 ` Mark Wielaard [this message]
2021-08-06 18:54 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2021-08-09 9:25 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-08-23 15:11 ` Noah Sanci
2021-08-24 8:18 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-08-27 18:38 ` Noah Sanci
2021-09-08 20:56 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-09-10 18:22 ` Noah Sanci
2021-09-12 19:08 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-09-13 20:07 ` Noah Sanci
2021-09-16 10:50 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-09-22 20:33 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2021-09-29 14:55 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-09-29 21:28 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2021-10-05 14:28 ` Mark Wielaard
2022-07-14 15:32 ` Noah Sanci
2022-08-04 13:12 ` Mark Wielaard
[not found] ` <CAJXA7qg09YkxK-NRQ31Hem0+54Us=jYC5+1siPSbHangx=SCow@mail.gmail.com>
2022-08-08 14:35 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-08-25 18:08 Noah Sanci
2021-09-08 15:01 ` Mark Wielaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=35f2073dfeed8f008d42a78bf60b7efcf13164eb.camel@klomp.org \
--to=mark@klomp.org \
--cc=elfutils-devel@sourceware.org \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=nsanci@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).