From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail01.ipfire.org (mail01.ipfire.org [81.3.27.42]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F7383858D32 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 13:31:15 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 9F7383858D32 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=ipfire.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ipfire.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by mail01.ipfire.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Rq5KY59z2z5y; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 13:31:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfire.org; s=202003ed25519; t=1695043873; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LAvvW59Rl+yobpvJslUgsKj1mnvEpXNZdYpE75Mf2d0=; b=GZk22MJBi7TELYmx9gQzsSge+46AjzGZ3+VIGTZ93aNmk2/obbWWZgWhRvzjGGBfQFY+kB WkqOvuLSdzGk82AA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipfire.org; s=202003rsa; t=1695043873; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LAvvW59Rl+yobpvJslUgsKj1mnvEpXNZdYpE75Mf2d0=; b=CLw9RPVWr4k7d/+JGNkUmEPGf2KqxchBuu4x6waBFyOWsc5tGJ2Xr48HXXKxbkIxBpSiIG btyIaZH/X/fLjpfmc3pK7t2/qAyJgIbK2e26m6qRApDJMk9LDWhnazDXrNi5qir7CEZw3i FwXXSDEAxvhck/ixSpxx2ILBAbgkdLgB+ghRFTtqMmwjU8xb0eTM1seAGDR2HN9OTzRvwJ SztpMmchOZ/ICnmXSKakSP3C4yxM3qj5zy9ifCwdInh8SZnmfwGZlwuAJ1T1fGcFH2qLvO dVct3htkaElhQjWyryg+86IdcADfHdrWAvu3PRKZgIev3FTVhz57tD4NrwudMw== Message-ID: <75af689342185f330883efca7626fcc5222e81e2.camel@ipfire.org> Subject: Re: make check fails for version 0.189 on aarch64 From: Jonatan Schlag To: Mark Wielaard Cc: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 15:31:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20230915212422.GB5558@gnu.wildebeest.org> References: <94bc9aa022bd220a9c2536399e57a958151a62bb.camel@ipfire.org> <20230915212422.GB5558@gnu.wildebeest.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Mark, Thanks for the prompt response. This error is now resolved. The test suite is happy. Turns out, it was a problem in then underlying image. After we updated it, the error went away. Greetings Jonatan Am Freitag, dem 15.09.2023 um 23:24 +0200 schrieb Mark Wielaard: > Hi Jonatan, >=20 > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 08:42:28PM +0200, Jonatan Schlag via > Elfutils-devel wrote: > > I'm currently trying to build elfutils in version 0.189 on an > > aarch64 > > system. Unfortunately, make check fails with the following errors: > >=20 > > https://nopaste.ipfire.org/view/Sx7pjy4g > >=20 > > The full log can be found here: > >=20 > > https://pakfire.ipfire.org/jobs/28a23239-80a6-4a24-b506-dbc367d96afa/lo= g > >=20 > > The same configuration works on x86_64. I currently run out of > > ideas > > what to try next. I know that the test suite passes on Debian for > > aarch64. So there must be an error with the system itself, but as > > said, > > I lack ideas how to debug this further. > >=20 > > Some input would be highly appreciated. >=20 > So you only got 4 FAILs. >=20 > FAIL: run-backtrace-native.sh > FAIL: run-backtrace-dwarf.sh > FAIL: run-backtrace-native-core.sh > FAIL: run-deleted.sh >=20 > And they all seem to fail in the same way. You get a backtrace, but > almost all symbol names come out empty/null. >=20 > But your configure line does contain -g so you should at least get it > for the elfutils libraries and (test) programs. The only possible > issue with your configure line is the use of -fdebug-prefix-map which > I believe doesn't work correctly when also using LTO. >=20 > And maybe your /usr/lib64/libc.so.6 might not have any symbols? >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Mark