public inbox for elfutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tino Mettler <tino.mettler@tikei.de>
To: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Missing .gnu_debugdata section on ARM platform when libdw is used by systemd-coredump
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 15:33:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <A67967D9-91A3-4216-8037-696944E76AD0@tikei.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2425384793cfe2a31e8d4d0c76b36d40f6e5304b.camel@klomp.org>


Hi Mark,

Am 06.05.2021 um 02:49 schrieb Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>:
> 
> Hi Tino,
> 
> On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 14:15 +0200, Tino Mettler via Elfutils-devel
> wrote:
>> I have a system running on 2 different architectures: AMD64 and ARM.
>> When a coredump happens, I want systemd-coredump to generate a stack
>> trace of the crashing application. Systemd depends on elfutils for
>> this feature. I use binaries with minidebuginfo (the LZMA compressed
>> symbol table in the .gnu_debugdata section) on both architectures.
>> 
>> I get a stack trace on AMD64, but not on ARM. While debugging this, I
>> saw that find_aux_sym() from dwfl_module_getdwarf.c does not find a
>> .gnu_debugdata section when iterating through the ELF using
>> elf_nextscn().
>> 
>> However, it finds a .gnu_debuglink section. I inspected the
>> executable and verified that it contains a .gnu_debugdata section and
>> it looks fine. Interestingly, there is no .gnu_debuglink section in
>> the executable despite elf_nextscn() seems to find one.
>> 
>> It looks like libdw does not process the actual executable, but a
>> modified variant, and the .gnu_debugdata section gets lost at some
>> point on my ARM device. Can you give me a hint where I need to look
>> at? Both devices run a different kernel with a different
>> configuration. Could that be related?
> 
> If possible you might want to post the core file and/or executables
> somewhere so others can inspect them. I am not completely sure how the
> .gnu_debugdata (aux symbols) is related. Are you getting a backtrace,
> but not function symbols for the addresses?

I'll try to provide a minimal example for this. I get only frame #0 of the
stack and no complete stack trace.

> 
> For ARM it might depend on whether the executable contains an .eh_frame
> sections. If it has (or the .debug file has an .debug_frame section)
> then libdw should be able to produce a backtrace.
> 
> But there are also ARM binaries which only come with IDX data, which
> libdw doesn't handle.

There is a .eh_frame in the binary.

Regards,
Tino


      reply	other threads:[~2021-05-18 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-04 12:15 Tino Mettler
2021-05-06  0:49 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-05-18 13:33   ` Tino Mettler [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=A67967D9-91A3-4216-8037-696944E76AD0@tikei.de \
    --to=tino.mettler@tikei.de \
    --cc=elfutils-devel@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).