public inbox for elfutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: marko@kevac.org
To: elfutils-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: Using libdw to get symbol names inside signal handler
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 14:41:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+RAKy6qpEcf_07JYKxvp5O5GVf3dk_AZSLy31WMsUX-MNtP=w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1459517668.8147.148.camel@redhat.com

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1259 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:34 PM Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com> wrote:

>
> It does have documentation, but it is indeed not as full as we would
> like. Please take a look at libdw.h and libdwfl.h
>

For someone who is familiar with ELF innards maybe, but for someone who
just wants backtrace and symbol names not so much :-)


> If you really need an in-process unwinder then I would recommend you
> take a look at the libbacktrace from the GCC project:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/libbacktrace/


I really do. Not only for logging after segmentation fault, but also for
watchdog feature: print stack trace if program stuck somewhere and could
not rewind SIGALRM timeout in time.

I have found standalone fork of libbacktrace (
https://github.com/ErwanLegrand/libbacktrace
<https://github.com/ErwanLegrand/libbacktrace_>) and will try it. Thank
you.


> If you just want to get a good backtrace when you get a SIGSEGV or other
> fatal signal it makes sense to just call eu-stack -P TID on yourself.
> fork and exec are signal safe. And then you don't have to try to deal
> with a possibly corrupt program.
>

It would be fine for SIGSEGV case, but not for watchdog (SIGALRM) case.

Thanks again for rapid answer!

[-- Attachment #2: attachment.html --]
[-- Type: text/html, Size: 1963 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2016-04-01 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-01 14:41 marko [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-04-01 13:34 Mark Wielaard
2016-04-01 11:38 marko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+RAKy6qpEcf_07JYKxvp5O5GVf3dk_AZSLy31WMsUX-MNtP=w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=marko@kevac.org \
    --cc=elfutils-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).