From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3123872244438704338=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Conrad Rad <cse.cem@gmail.com>
To: elfutils-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: dwarf_aggregate_size() seems to fall over on pointer types
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 15:10:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG6CVpXZRinqsUouO=ZOpDg_S2KV7i+7zVd1C1daxWTrKq4MDA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 20141001183326.GA25015@blokker.redhat.com

--===============3123872244438704338==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 10:46:52AM -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
> How about the attached patch? (I haven't yet looked at the MIPS issue,
> but think it reasonable to require the producer to add an explicit
> DW_AT_byte_size if the assumption of address size is not correct.)

On my repro, it fixes the pointer member, but not the array-of-pointer memb=
er.

struct b {
        char *d;
        void *e[3];
...
};

$ ./repro a.out:
...
        agg_size(b. (type  ) d): 8, 0xffffffff
...
        agg_size(b. (type  ) e): -1, 0xffffffff
...

Thanks,
Conrad

--===============3123872244438704338==--