From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CF63858404 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 15:11:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A9CF63858404 Received: from mail-il1-f199.google.com (mail-il1-f199.google.com [209.85.166.199]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-453-q0g-70EbOEa2HhSrTZ-esg-1; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:11:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: q0g-70EbOEa2HhSrTZ-esg-1 Received: by mail-il1-f199.google.com with SMTP id j6-20020a056e02014600b00224bde51e20so8546101ilr.5 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:11:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MZ1ChvNYk/tGAgdCC6Lw7FNt7/4mZDVf4FIAoX8z5QQ=; b=Uu2sXAjuwFzyFoG4Dd7K3V0UgKmJoQbmkWKwEb20YWk3hVgJk7YBGd9dT9U4Y5WQEx kpNiVM00cQKaUx+j5b36ri5HMyNBtGAo2xz4a2J5t3j8Nar07N9kjeWxzhl/ahiKyj3H JbFlD1K4ng0KzjfoI6sTA0j/7hdOsj5D6ojMDAS56jDc6hXGc/3pLIMDmvWyilPNuxRj /tGu05WHiUlzfiCzyOdY0CRSG7tPHwE/9WQX0mLltiTZxB1VG8eQ27DSyJ3wWYGqYiLd IqXNsnksNfvyp7YkXrqzZaCkYEiyZQe4g4qtuHgX6T7ZhobtJ+jrw85mHyEVs/vFjM5c fopw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531E7HBjn8wrl/M2vuoIXCcFc8Eki7n9D+3Lo2Mnmg5rK6/EPagZ a7kzghsgU3j9epdOi8Twkg+OCXBUkJHB9DVNLUli68awtafbORe40KjbcTjbZvnVqPuYGVdEU8c MuauW+jasEZkrQfnfK8d2gNNXu459te9ObNZHptxE3g== X-Received: by 2002:a02:9f16:: with SMTP id z22mr29718212jal.18.1629731478188; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:11:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwIBENn3NELMZJE364Gjt7+PsKYIruGoyhfFhKGoUZii6nBoNsOrHeErX9M3DRjjNKENMUFuKB5j8LDcAmTqG8= X-Received: by 2002:a02:9f16:: with SMTP id z22mr29718198jal.18.1629731477996; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:11:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210805165402.GD4195@redhat.com> <35f2073dfeed8f008d42a78bf60b7efcf13164eb.camel@klomp.org> <20210806185459.GE4195@redhat.com> <9ac621fee207ef233873c40843b3d34ced9019cc.camel@klomp.org> In-Reply-To: <9ac621fee207ef233873c40843b3d34ced9019cc.camel@klomp.org> From: Noah Sanci Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:11:07 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bug debuginfod/27277] Describe retrieved files when verbose To: Mark Wielaard Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" , elfutils-devel@sourceware.org X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Elfutils-devel mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 15:11:31 -0000 Hello, I'm back to working on this patch, thanks for your patience and comments. On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 5:27 AM Mark Wielaard wrote: > Yes, separate the verbose printing of http headers (which I really do > like) from providing an interface to query what needs to be done to get > some file (is it in cache, can it be retieved from a remote server, how > big is it?) I don't think providing raw http headers is that interface. Should I separate the verbose printing of http headers and the new interface into different PRs? -Noah Sanci