John and I discussed that atomic_compare_exchange_strong could have been
used here. I see that this has been pushed to the main branch, but I can
make the change to the atomic operation if you think that is a better
option.

Best,
Heather

On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 9:00 AM Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> wrote:

> Hi Heather,
>
> On Tue, 2023-10-10 at 15:42 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > From: Heather McIntyre <hsm2@rice.edu>
> >
> >       * elf_version.c (version_once): Define once.
> >       (initialize_version): New static function.
> >       (elf_version): Use initialize_version version_once.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heather S. McIntyre <hsm2@rice.edu>
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
> > ---
> >  libelf/elf_version.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/libelf/elf_version.c b/libelf/elf_version.c
> > index 6ec534ab..8296bb65 100644
> > --- a/libelf/elf_version.c
> > +++ b/libelf/elf_version.c
> > @@ -32,12 +32,21 @@
> >  #endif
> >
> >  #include <libelfP.h>
> > +#include <pthread.h>
> >
> > +/* Multiple threads may initialize __libelf_version.
> > +   pthread_once() ensures that __libelf_version is initialized only
> once. */
> > +once_define(static, version_once);
> >
> >  /* Currently selected version.  Should be EV_CURRENT.
> >     Will be EV_NONE if elf_version () has not been called yet.  */
> >  unsigned int __libelf_version = EV_NONE;
> >
> > +static void initialize_version(void)
> > +{
> > +  __libelf_version = EV_CURRENT;
> > +}
> > +
> >  unsigned int
> >  elf_version (unsigned int version)
> >  {
> > @@ -49,7 +58,7 @@ elf_version (unsigned int version)
> >        /* Phew, we know this version.  */
> >
> >        /* Signal that the version is now initialized.  */
> > -      __libelf_version = EV_CURRENT;
> > +      once(version_once, initialize_version);
> >
> >        /* And return the last (or initial) version.  */
> >        return EV_CURRENT;
>
> This is an odd function. The intention clearly was to support more "ELF
> versions" at some point. But (luckily) that never happened and I doubt
> there will ever be a different (incompatible) ELF version that we'll
> have to support. So in the end this will always be EV_CURRENT == 1. But
> the function has to be called to make the rest of the library work.
>
> I think this works and is fine. There will most likely never be real
> contention calling elf_version because normally a program just calls it
> once at the start.
>
> But have you thought about using some atomic operation here instead?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
>