Re: ☠ Buildbot (Sourceware): elfutils-snapshots-coverage - failed test (failure) (main)

[Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 4:23 AM Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Khem,
>
> On Mon, 2024-03-11 at 02:33 +0000, builder@sourceware.org wrote:
> > A new failure has been detected on builder elfutils-snapshots-coverage while building elfutils.
> >
> > Full details are available at:
> >     https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/250/builds/105
> >
> > Build state: failed test (failure)
> > Revision: d74f4c1d572fbeb7454a2ffa02cbc955ea24780d
> > Worker: snapshots
> > Build Reason: (unknown)
> > Blamelist: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> >
> > Steps:
> >
> > - 0: worker_preparation ( success )
> >
> > - 1: git checkout ( success )
> >     Logs:
> >         - stdio: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/250/builds/105/steps/1/logs/stdio
> >
> > - 2: autoreconf ( success )
> >     Logs:
> >         - stdio: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/250/builds/105/steps/2/logs/stdio
> >
> > - 3: configure ( success )
> >     Logs:
> >         - stdio: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/250/builds/105/steps/3/logs/stdio
> >         - config.log: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/250/builds/105/steps/3/logs/config_log
> >
> > - 4: make ( warnings )
> >     Logs:
> >         - stdio: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/250/builds/105/steps/4/logs/stdio
> >         - warnings (3): https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/250/builds/105/steps/4/logs/warnings__3_
> >
> > - 5: make check ( failure )
> >     Logs:
> >         - stdio: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/250/builds/105/steps/5/logs/stdio
> >         - test-suite.log: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/250/builds/105/steps/5/logs/test-suite_log
>
> That was clearly not your fault. There seems to be a space missing in
> the make -kcheck command (after the -k). I'll go look in the builder
> sources where that came from.

Thanks Mark !

>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark