From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (wildebeest.demon.nl [212.238.236.112]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ED8C384803D for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 22:14:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6ED8C384803D Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org Received: from reform (deer0x04.wildebeest.org [172.31.17.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C135301B4CC; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:14:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by reform (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 081FD2E80738; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:14:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:14:40 +0200 From: Mark Wielaard To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Buildbot failure in Wildebeest Builder on whole buildset Message-ID: References: <20210615212946.ACB73801D17@builder.wildebeest.org> <20210615215318.GJ3758@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210615215318.GJ3758@redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Elfutils-devel mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 22:14:43 -0000 Hi Frank, On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 05:53:18PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > [...] But run-find-debuginfo.sh failed for (I think) unrelated reasons. > > Any objection to me firing in some speculative tests/run-debuginfod* > patches into the buildbot to evoke more usefully verbose failures? If you think it helps diagnose these spurious failure please do. It might also help to split this test into smaller ones to make sure the tests just test one specific thing. Thanks, Mark