From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (gnu.wildebeest.org [45.83.234.184]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8E383858D1E for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 12:26:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D8E383858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org Received: from tarox.wildebeest.org (83-87-18-245.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.87.18.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54235300071A; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 13:26:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by tarox.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6301C413CD0E; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 13:26:19 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] support cross compilation From: Mark Wielaard To: Petr Ovtchenkov , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C9rico?= Nogueira Cc: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 13:26:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20210526163428.2888e7ef@void-ptr.info> References: <20210526135850.1b967be8@void-ptr.info> <20210526163428.2888e7ef@void-ptr.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-10.el7) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3032.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi, It looks like I missed this. Sorry. On Wed, 2021-05-26 at 19:34 +0300, Petr Ovtchenkov wrote: > On Wed, 26 May 2021 12:41:51 -0300 > =C3=89rico Nogueira wrote: >=20 > >=20 > > Yes, we really cross. >=20 > It doesn't matter because >=20 > > We always use the release tarballs, which already have the %_dis.h > > files. This explains why we haven't hit any issues. >=20 >=20 > > Anyway, couldn't you (re)use the distribution tarball generation > > stuff > > for cross setups from git master? >=20 > I can. But I haven't problems with building it "directly from VCS" > too, > as you see. Nevertheless there are opinion that code from VCS > could be smoothly building without procedures behind scene. Isn't it simpler to first do a local make dist and then build cross from that? Cheers, Mark