From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <elfutils-devel-return-6393-listarch-elfutils-devel=sourceware.org@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 100697 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2017 16:04:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact elfutils-devel-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <elfutils-devel.sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:elfutils-devel@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:elfutils-devel-help@sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:elfutils-devel-subscribe@sourceware.org>
Sender: elfutils-devel-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 100650 invoked by uid 48); 17 Nov 2017 16:04:13 -0000
From: "brueckner at linux dot vnet.ibm.com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libdw/22452] Failed to obtain CFI data for a OP_call_frame_CFA when looking for func entrypoc in an s390 kernel module
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: elfutils
X-Bugzilla-Component: libdw
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: brueckner at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-22452-10460-hWHrPQTkIU@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-22452-10460@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-22452-10460@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2017-q4/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D22452

--- Comment #8 from H. Brueckner <brueckner at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #5)
> (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #4)
> > So, if you could provide the output of eu-readelf --relocs paes_s390.ko=
 (on
> > your combined paes_s390.ko containing both code and debug) that would be
> > helpful.
>=20
> eu-readelf --debug-dump=3Dframes --relocs paes_s390.ko
>=20
> would be even better.

Just attached the output; also the output of the binutils readelf command f=
or
comparision. I guess that there are some more issues because lots of invalid
relocations are listed.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.