public inbox for elfutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mark at klomp dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug libelf/26878] elflint reports error on SHT_X86_64_UNWIND .eh_frame section
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 13:45:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-26878-10460-8QsvDQEjkH@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-26878-10460@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26878

Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |mark at klomp dot org

--- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org> ---
(In reply to Timm Bäder from comment #0)
> Created attachment 12953 [details]
> elfstrmerge.o compiled with clang
> 
> gold and clang seem to emit .eh_frame sections of type SHT_X86_64_UNWIND.

And we already handle gold, which (normally) outputs .eh_frame (and
.eh_frame_hdr) without any relocations (because that is what a linker does,
resolve the relocations :). So for non-ET_REL files we already seem to handle
SHT_X86_64_UNWIND see:

commit 22ec8efc1dd87cdc7892523457eb55990b967224
Author: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
Date:   Sat Nov 10 23:33:03 2018 +0100

    elflint: Allow PT_GNU_EH_FRAME segment to match SHT_X86_64_UNWIND section.

    The gold linker might generate an .eh_frame_hdr with a SHT_X86_64_UNWIND
    type instead of a SHT_PROGBITS type.

    Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>

commit 4b0342b85b5b1a3d3636e06e3b5320954828dfb1
Author: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
Date:   Tue Nov 6 12:01:25 2018 +0100

    backends: Add x86_64 section_type_name for SHT_X86_64_UNWIND.

    Makes sure that eu-readelf and eu-elflint recognize and show the
    x86_64 specific section type correctly.

    Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
    Tested-by: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>

And I see that Navin just posted a fix for eblcheckreloctargettype:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/elfutils-devel/2020q4/003127.html

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-17 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-13 14:58 [Bug libelf/26878] New: " tbaeder at redhat dot com
2020-11-17 13:45 ` mark at klomp dot org [this message]
2020-11-18 11:38 ` [Bug libelf/26878] " mark at klomp dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-26878-10460-8QsvDQEjkH@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=elfutils-devel@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).