public inbox for elfutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "sergiodj at sergiodj dot net" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug debuginfod/27531] Support retry of failed downloads
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 20:38:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-27531-10460-3JXt23U9Fc@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-27531-10460@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27531

--- Comment #3 from Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at sergiodj dot net> ---
(In reply to Frank Ch. Eigler from comment #1)
> Can you collect more information about the nature of the timeouts and
> what diagnostics if any libcurl/debuginfod-client returned?  The default
> timeout imposed by the debuginfod-client code is 90s to start returning
> file content, as governed by the $DEBUGINFOD_TIMEOUT environment variable.
> Would these folks like us to retry *beyond* that timeout?

First of all: yes, I can try to collect more info from them.  I've just emailed
one of the guys who brought this to my attention, and asked him if he can
provide more info and leave a comment here.

With that out of the way, I think it's worth mentioning that the retry idea did
not come from the reports I've received.  It is something that I figured would
be nice to have in order to mitigate the issues.

We are talking about two distinct (albeit related) things here: having a big
timeout does not necessarily mean that the download will succeeded, therefore
having the possibility of retrying makes a lot of sense.

> Or is the timeout at some earlier stage?  We'd need the diagnostics or
> packet trace or something like that.

I understand the intention to address the timeout problem, but there are things
out of debuginfod's control here.  One of the emails I received was from a
person who lives in China and therefore has to cope with their sub-optimal
international links.  As far as I understood from what they explained, a
connection between China and Europe is prone to suffer from the instability
that was reported.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-07 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-06  7:46 [Bug debuginfod/27531] New: " sergiodj at sergiodj dot net
2021-03-06 18:08 ` [Bug debuginfod/27531] " fche at redhat dot com
2021-03-07  2:34 ` fche at redhat dot com
2021-03-07 20:38 ` sergiodj at sergiodj dot net [this message]
2021-03-07 22:04 ` fche at redhat dot com
2021-03-14 17:14 ` zsj950618 at gmail dot com
2021-03-14 17:16 ` zsj950618 at gmail dot com
2021-03-14 17:29 ` fche at redhat dot com
2021-03-14 18:02 ` zsj950618 at gmail dot com
2021-03-14 18:03 ` zsj950618 at gmail dot com
2021-03-14 22:58 ` fche at redhat dot com
2021-03-14 23:07 ` sergiodj at sergiodj dot net
2021-03-18 16:54 ` fche at redhat dot com
2021-07-09 13:58 ` mark at klomp dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-27531-10460-3JXt23U9Fc@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
    --cc=elfutils-devel@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).