From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 182E8385840E; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 02:29:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 182E8385840E
From: "wilson at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug backends/27925] riscv backend only provides return value
 locations for code compiled for LP64D ABI
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 02:29:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: elfutils
X-Bugzilla-Component: backends
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-27925-10460-QIS9yw2hnv@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-27925-10460@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-27925-10460@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Elfutils-devel mailing list <elfutils-devel.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/elfutils-devel>,
 <mailto:elfutils-devel-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/elfutils-devel/>
List-Help: <mailto:elfutils-devel-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/elfutils-devel>,
 <mailto:elfutils-devel-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 02:29:24 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D27925

--- Comment #5 from Jim Wilson <wilson at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I hadn't thought about the kernel.  It is compiled LP64 and with the FP
extensions disabled, to avoid accidentally using FP registers.  It does
save/restore FP registers in the context switching code, but otherwise does=
n't
use FP registers, so that we don't have to save/restore FP registers in sys=
tem
calls.  If there are no FP types in the kernel then LP64D will behave
identically to LP64.  But if you have a testsuite that checks all features,
then we would have to implement LP64 correctly, and your patch is a step in=
 the
right direction.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=