From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 1A817383E68C; Sat, 28 May 2022 00:22:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1A817383E68C
From: "evvers at ya dot ru" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug general/29176] run-backtrace-native-biarch.sh seems to fail on
 Ubuntu Jammy
Date: Sat, 28 May 2022 00:22:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: elfutils
X-Bugzilla-Component: general
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: evvers at ya dot ru
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-29176-10460-nwz1fXEGhS@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-29176-10460@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-29176-10460@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Elfutils-devel mailing list <elfutils-devel.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/elfutils-devel>,
 <mailto:elfutils-devel-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/elfutils-devel/>
List-Help: <mailto:elfutils-devel-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/elfutils-devel>,
 <mailto:elfutils-devel-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 May 2022 00:22:18 -0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29176

--- Comment #6 from Evgeny Vereshchagin <evvers at ya dot ru> ---
> Is the dbgsym package for the main (x86_64) libc6 package also installed?

As far as I can see libc6-dbg is installed there but even without it when c=
ode
is compiled without -m32 and aborts backtraces don't contain NULL/unknown
symbols:
```
#0  0x00007ffff7e25a7c in pthread_kill () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.s=
o.6
#1  0x00007ffff7dd1476 in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#2  0x00007ffff7db77f3 in abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#3  0x0000555555555161 in main ()
```

With -m32 and without the "x32" debug symbols backtraces look like
```
#0  0xf7fc4559 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1  0xf7e10e37 in ?? () from /lib32/libc.so.6
#2  0xf7dc04c5 in raise () from /lib32/libc.so.6
#3  0xf7da93ac in abort () from /lib32/libc.so.6
#4  0x565561b5 in main ()
```

> We probably should just skip any unknown/NULL symbols.

As far as I understand it should make the test pass even without the debug
symbols.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=