From: "fche at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug debuginfod/30221] Negative cache should differentiate failure types
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 01:20:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-30221-10460-zztwQpSm8v@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-30221-10460@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30221
--- Comment #6 from Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Vicki Pfau from comment #2)
> 404 and the like *may* be transient, but the fact of the matter is that
> *most* of the time it won't be And it's a cache, not a definitive answer
> saying this will never exist. Having a 404 cache for 10x the amount of time
> as a Ctrl-C
I don't understand - a ctrl-C should not result in a cached artifact at all.
If that's happening, we should fix that.
> I'm already dealing with gdb taking well
> over 30 seconds to start running a program with a bunch of shared object
> dependencies that aren't in debuginfod...
Uncached misses from debuginfod tend to take on the order of milliseconds,
much less than seconds. Do you have a trace of what's happening?
(DEBUGINFOD_VERBOSE=1 or something like that?)
> [...] because there's no way for the cache to say "this probably won't
> appear in the short term." Setting cache_miss_s higher works, but is a
> workaround.
That workaround is precisely the parameter for the quantity you seek.
> Your filesystem representation works
> for the small, simple case you have here, but it won't scale if you try and
> extend the system with any metadata at all.
That's fine. If we can revisit when rationale exists for more metadata.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-17 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-11 1:32 [Bug debuginfod/30221] New: " vi at endrift dot com
2023-03-13 16:40 ` [Bug debuginfod/30221] " fche at redhat dot com
2023-03-14 1:47 ` vi at endrift dot com
2023-03-17 1:00 ` vi at endrift dot com
2023-03-17 1:08 ` fche at redhat dot com
2023-03-17 1:16 ` vi at endrift dot com
2023-03-17 1:20 ` fche at redhat dot com [this message]
2023-03-17 1:28 ` vi at endrift dot com
2023-03-17 1:30 ` vi at endrift dot com
2023-03-17 16:16 ` amerey at redhat dot com
2023-03-17 16:53 ` amerey at redhat dot com
2023-03-17 23:39 ` vi at endrift dot com
2023-03-24 11:22 ` fche at redhat dot com
2023-04-08 13:29 ` mark at klomp dot org
2023-04-21 2:04 ` fche at redhat dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-30221-10460-zztwQpSm8v@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org \
--cc=elfutils-devel@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).