From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 108613 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2018 23:25:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact elfutils-devel-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: Sender: elfutils-devel-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 108592 invoked by uid 89); 14 Nov 2018 23:25:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Checked: by ClamAV 0.100.2 on sourceware.org X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-HELO: gnu.wildebeest.org Received: from wildebeest.demon.nl (HELO gnu.wildebeest.org) (212.238.236.112) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 23:25:02 +0000 Received: from tarox.wildebeest.org (tarox.wildebeest.org [172.31.17.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA2AB3085EA1; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:24:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by tarox.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3AF40413CD4B; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:24:59 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle GNU Build Attribute ELF Notes. From: Mark Wielaard To: Nick Clifton , elfutils-devel@sourceware.org Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 23:25:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <6d0aa0643969a7c0e3c5fdce9497ccb95a1e330e.camel@klomp.org> References: <1542065698-4660-1-git-send-email-mark@klomp.org> <6d0aa0643969a7c0e3c5fdce9497ccb95a1e330e.camel@klomp.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-2.el7) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-q4/txt/msg00130.txt.bz2 Hi Nick, I have a local hack that defines SHF_GNU_BUILD_NOTE and allows it in elflint. But without any documentation on what the semantics of this section flag are. I cannot find this flag being used in the binaries generated on Fedora 29. Is this flag ever used? Thanks, Mark