From: "Paul Beskeen" <paulb@redhat.com>
To: "Jim Kingdon" <kingdon@redhat.com>, <elix@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Cc: <lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org>
Subject: Re: Cooperation between EL/IX and LSB
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 13:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00fe01bf6a9c$9be3c020$f8f3fea9@cerberus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200001271848.NAA02772@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
> In the Linux Standard Base (LSB) we have often wished there were a bit
> more coordination between EL/IX and the LSB
> ( http://www.linuxbase.org/ ) since after all the EL/IX level 4 API is
> probably pretty much synonymous with the LSB API (the efforts are not
> quite the same, for one thing the LSB also is working on an ABI,
> anyway, the point is there is overlap not that we're identical).
Seems like a good idea. We would be happy to work with the LSB to ensure
compatibility between EL/IX and the LSB spec. As an initial step we will
examine the possibility of formalizing the LSB as the definition of EL/IX
level 4.
> * If EL/IX would be interested in adding a link from the EL/IX web
> site to linuxbase.org, that would be great.
No problem.
> * Linuxbase.org is currently a distributed (that is, support from many
> vendors) effort that maintains our specification via CVS - see
> http://www.linuxbase.org/devel.html
>
> We would like to ask whether EL/IX would be interested in
> maintaining the EL/IX specification in the same way. In particular,
> the LSB spec is maintained in a combination of
> MySQL/DocBook/makefiles which, although somewhat complicated, makes
> it easy to add additional columns for "included in EL/IX level 1"?
> "included in EL/IX level 2"? And so on. It already has columns for
> Single Unix Spec, POSIX, &c.
Ok, we will take a look and see how this might work. The EL/IX std has more
complexity with regard to options, but should be able to find ways of
handling this.
Cheers, Paul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-01-29 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-01-27 10:48 Jim Kingdon
2000-01-29 13:07 ` Paul Beskeen [this message]
2000-01-29 20:36 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-01-30 8:20 ` Stuart Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00fe01bf6a9c$9be3c020$f8f3fea9@cerberus' \
--to=paulb@redhat.com \
--cc=elix@sourceware.cygnus.com \
--cc=kingdon@redhat.com \
--cc=lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).